Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
future threats
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "future threats" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing potential dangers or risks that may arise in the coming time. Example: "The report outlines various future threats to national security that we must prepare for."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
That information could potentially be valuable in combating future threats.
News & Media
"Israel's present military action will increase the future threats to its security rather than countering them.
News & Media
Analysts spend their lives trying to anticipate future threats and understand underlying forces.
News & Media
"Hopefully, this will help people to be realistic about assessing future threats," he said.
News & Media
The future threats can remain fully unknowable and fully addressable – on the individual level.
News & Media
According to Ms. Miller, the letter "contained future threats against the United States".
News & Media
Then we would all benefit from a serious bulwark to protect against future threats that are already on the horizon.
News & Media
But predicting the nature of future threats (and thus which service will be most needed) is a fraught task.
News & Media
It trades on abominable but vague future threats that are absurd when you speak them out loud.
News & Media
Combatting current proliferation dangers in North Korea and Iran, and future threats elsewhere, will require a deft combination of approaches.
News & Media
But this change must be underpinned by rigorous analysis of future threats and our intent to act on the world stage.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing "future threats", clearly define the specific area or domain to which the threats pertain (e.g., cybersecurity, environmental conservation, public health) to provide context and clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "future threats" without specifying the nature or source of the threat. Vague references can lead to misinterpretation and ineffective planning. Instead, be specific about the potential dangers and their origins to facilitate more effective mitigation strategies.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "future threats" functions primarily as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies potential dangers or risks that are expected to materialize at a later time. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a common and grammatically sound expression.
Frequent in
News & Media
48%
Science
39%
Formal & Business
4%
Less common in
Wiki
4%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "future threats" is a grammatically sound and frequently used noun phrase, as indicated by Ludwig. It serves to highlight potential dangers that may arise in the future, prompting proactive planning and mitigation efforts. Predominantly found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, the expression is suitable for both neutral and formal registers. To ensure clarity and effectiveness, avoid vagueness and clearly define the specific domain to which the threats pertain. Common alternatives include "emerging risks" and "potential hazards". Ludwig AI confirms its broad applicability and correct usage.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
prospective threats
Focuses on threats that are likely to occur in the future.
possible risks
Indicates the uncertainty and possibility of risks occurring.
potential hazards
Emphasizes the possibility of harm or danger.
anticipated dangers
Highlights that the dangers are expected and prepared for.
emerging risks
Highlights the novelty and increasing nature of the risks.
projected risks
Focuses on risks that are predicted based on current trends.
impending dangers
Focuses on the imminence and potential severity of the threats.
upcoming menaces
Emphasizes the approaching nature of the threats.
forthcoming perils
Indicates that the dangers are approaching and unavoidable.
looming menaces
Suggests a threatening presence that is becoming increasingly apparent.
FAQs
How can I use "future threats" in a sentence?
You can use "future threats" to discuss potential dangers or risks that may arise later, such as, "Governments must prepare for "future threats" to national security by investing in advanced technologies".
What is a good alternative to "future threats"?
Alternatives include "emerging risks", "potential hazards", or "impending dangers", depending on the specific context.
What's the difference between "future threats" and "current threats"?
"Future threats" refer to risks that are anticipated to occur in the future, while "current threats" are those that are happening now. Planning involves addressing both "current threats" and preparing for "future threats".
Is it better to say "future risks" or "future threats"?
Both phrases are acceptable. "Future risks" might be preferred in contexts where the focus is on potential negative outcomes with some uncertainty, whereas "future threats" may be used when the emphasis is on deliberate or foreseeable dangers. They both carry similar meaning and can often be used interchangeably.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested