further details were given

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "further details were given" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that additional information has been provided or shared in a discussion or document. Example: "After the meeting, further details were given about the project's timeline and budget."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

29 human-written examples

No further details were given.

The New York Times

Nor further details were given.

The New York Times

No further details were given by police.

The New York Times

No further details were given as to cause of death.

The Guardian - Film

No further details were given on the sites or about what the inspection teams discovered.

The New York Times

Militants were reportedly dislodged from some areas outside the city but no further details were given.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

31 human-written examples

She requested no further details be given.

The Guardian - Opinion

He is a soft spoken man in his early 40s who requested no further details be given about him.

The Guardian - Opinion

No further details are given.

Cancer Nanotechnology

Further details are given below.

Progress in Biomaterials

Further details are given in [12].

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the audience when using "further details were given". In formal or academic writing, ensure that these details are properly cited or referenced to maintain credibility and transparency.

Common error

While "further details were given" is grammatically correct, overuse of the passive voice can make writing seem vague or indirect. If possible, rephrase to use an active voice for more direct and engaging content. For instance, instead of "further details were given by the police", consider "the police provided further details".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "further details were given" primarily functions as a reporting clause, indicating that additional information has been provided. Ludwig AI shows the phrase frequently appears in contexts where information is being relayed or explained.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

33%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "further details were given" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate that additional information has been shared. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and usability across various contexts. While predominantly found in news and scientific sources, it maintains a neutral tone suitable for relaying information objectively. Remember to ensure clarity by specifying the source and nature of the additional details to enhance the phrase's impact. While grammatically correct, consider active voice alternatives for more engaging writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more information was disclosed

This alternative uses "disclosed" instead of "given", implying that the information was revealed or made known.

additional specifics were shared

Using "specifics" highlights that particular details were communicated, and "shared" suggests a more active dissemination of information.

supplementary data was presented

"Supplementary data" is often used in a scientific context, indicating that extra information was provided, and "presented" suggests a formal delivery of that information.

elaborations were offered

"Elaborations" suggests that more extensive explanations or expansions were provided on a topic.

additional facts were revealed

Focuses on the unveiling of new factual information.

further clarification was provided

Implies that something was made clearer through additional information.

more insight was offered

Suggests that deeper understanding or perspective was shared.

greater elaboration was shared

Similar to "elaborations were offered" but emphasizes the extent of the elaboration.

the exposition was expanded

Indicates that the explanation or detailed description was extended or broadened.

the explanation was augmented

Suggests that the explanation was enhanced or supplemented with more information.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "further details were given" to sound more active?

You can use active voice constructions such as "the source provided more details" or "the spokesperson elaborated on the matter". These alternatives make the sentence more direct and engaging.

What's the difference between "additional details were given" and "further details were given"?

Both phrases are quite similar, but "additional details were given" may imply that the details are simply extra, whereas "further details were given" suggests a continuation or expansion of previously mentioned information.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "further details were given"?

It's suitable in news reports, academic papers, or any situation where you need to indicate that more information has been provided about a specific topic. However, ensure that the context clarifies who provided the details and what they pertain to.

What are some alternatives to "further details were given" that maintain a formal tone?

Alternatives include "more information was disclosed", "supplementary data was presented", or "additional specifics were shared". These options provide similar information in a slightly different tone.