funds were received

USAGE SUMMARY

"funds were received" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to indicate that money has arrived into an account or pot of funds. For example, "The project was finally able to launch after the funds were received."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

28 human-written examples

Virtually no funds were received by North Korea as a result of the Agreed Framework.

The Washington Post

Ms. Arroyo has said her relatives were no longer employed by the group at the time the funds were received.

The New York Times

As the Trustee also acknowledges, that money was never used — and in fact was returned the next day — because the necessary funds were received from Sterling's lenders by the buyout deadline, and were used to fund the buyout".

The New York Times - Sports

That said – and once corrected and once the funds were received – as a gesture of goodwill we immediately backdated the interest on the customer's account to 2 October 2015 [the intended date of transfer] to ensure there was no loss of interest".

Independent

No funds were received for the manuscript's preparation.

Critical Ultrasound Journal

No funds were received by members of the team.

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

32 human-written examples

No grants or external funding were received for this study.

BMC Gastroenterology

Funding information is not applicable, no funding was received.

Journal of Shipping and Trade

No funding was received.

Health Economics Review

No external funding was received.

Journal of Cheminformatics

No funding was received for manuscript.

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "funds were received", ensure the context clearly indicates the source and purpose of the funds for transparency and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "fund was received" when referring to multiple funds. Ensure subject-verb agreement by using the plural form "funds" with "were received".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "funds were received" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that money or financial resources have been obtained. It highlights the action of receiving funds rather than who provided them. Ludwig provides several examples demonstrating its usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

30%

Less common in

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "funds were received" is a grammatically correct and professionally appropriate phrase used to indicate that money or financial resources have been obtained. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage and provides examples across science, news, and business contexts. While not extremely common, it's a clear and objective way to report the receipt of financial resources. Related phrases include "monies were received" and "funding was received", offering alternative ways to express the same idea. When using this phrase, clarity regarding the source and purpose of the funds is crucial.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

monies were received

Uses a synonym for "funds" to indicate the receipt of money.

grants were received

Specifies the type of funds received as grants.

funding was received

Replaces "funds" with the more general term "funding".

contributions were received

Specifies the funds were received as contributions.

financial support was obtained

Emphasizes the acquisition of financial support.

financial assistance was granted

Focuses on the act of granting financial assistance.

payments were credited

Indicates that payments have been successfully added to an account.

capital was secured

Highlights the securing of capital.

revenue was generated

Focuses on revenue generation, implying funds coming in.

income was realized

Indicates the realization of income.

FAQs

How can I use "funds were received" in a sentence?

Use "funds were received" to indicate that money or financial resources have been obtained. For example, "The project was initiated after the funds were received".

What can I say instead of "funds were received"?

You can use alternatives like "monies were received", "funding was received", or "contributions were received" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "fund was received" instead of "funds were received"?

No, it's generally incorrect if you are referring to multiple sources of money. "Fund was received" is only appropriate if you are referring to a single, specific fund. The correct plural form is "funds were received".

What is the difference between "funds were allocated" and "funds were received"?

"Funds were allocated" means that funds have been designated for a specific purpose, while "funds were received" means that the money has actually arrived or been obtained.