funds to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "funds to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the allocation or transfer of money for a specific purpose or project. Example: "The organization has allocated funds to support local community initiatives."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Were hedge funds to blame for either?

The Economist

Funds to repair roads have disappeared.

The Economist

funds to Turkey.

The New York Times

games for funds to play.

The New York Times

distribute funds to successful applicants.

Cornell University

He lacks the funds to buy.

The Guardian - Sport

Why rush these funds to market?

The New York Times

They've got the funds to do it".

The New York Times

to raise funds to fight Ebola.

The Guardian

He has trimmed funds to village mayors.

The New York Times

which transfer funds to the issuer.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "funds to", clearly specify the purpose or recipient of the funds to avoid ambiguity. For example, "allocate funds to research" is clearer than simply saying "allocate funds".

Common error

Avoid using "funds to" in overly broad or vague statements. Instead of saying "funds to improve things", specify which "things" will be improved, such as "funds to improve infrastructure" or "funds to improve education".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "funds to" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase indicating the direction or purpose of financial resources. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically sound and common in English writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

51%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Academia

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "funds to" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that signifies the allocation or provision of financial resources for a specific purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in English writing. It is commonly found in news, scientific, and business contexts, indicating a neutral register. When using "funds to", it's crucial to clearly define the purpose or recipient of the funds to prevent ambiguity. The phrase can be replaced by alternatives like "financial support for" or "funding for", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

funding for

A more concise and direct alternative.

financial support for

Emphasizes the supportive role of the funding.

financial backing for

Focuses on the act of providing financial support.

financial resources for

Replaces "funds" with a broader term, emphasizing resources rather than just money.

investment in

Highlights the investment aspect of providing funds.

capital allocation for

Focuses on the deliberate distribution of capital.

resources dedicated to

Highlights the commitment of resources to a specific cause.

budget allocation for

Specifies that the funds are coming from a budget.

monetary assistance for

Highlights the aid aspect of the funds.

grants for

Implies the funds are provided as grants.

FAQs

How can I use "funds to" in a sentence?

The phrase "funds to" is used to indicate the allocation or provision of financial resources for a specific purpose. For example, "The company allocated "funds to" expand its operations" or "They are raising "funds to" support cancer research".

What are some alternatives to "funds to"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "financial support for", "monetary assistance for", or "funding for". Each alternative slightly shifts the emphasis, so choose the one that best fits your intended meaning.

Is it better to say "funds for" or "funds to"?

Both "funds for" and ""funds to"" are grammatically correct, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "Funds for" is generally used to indicate a general purpose, while ""funds to"" often precedes a verb, indicating an action to be taken with the funds. For example, "funds for education" versus "funds to support students".

What does it mean to allocate "funds to" a project?

To allocate ""funds to"" a project means to officially assign a specific amount of money to be used for that project's expenses. This implies a formal decision and a commitment of resources.