funding to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "funding to" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
Example: The government has allocated funding to support small businesses during the pandemic.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Meanwhile, grant funding to charities is decreasing.

The Guardian

Fifa froze its funding to the TTFF.

The Guardian - Sport

We've lost our funding to do that".

The Guardian

I'm applying for funding to do this.

The New Yorker

ACE announced regular funding to 110 new organisations.

The Guardian

"University researchers are, and they get funding to do so.

The New York Times

The debate has moved on from funding to delivery".

The Guardian

This made maintaining funding to the ABC vital.

The Guardian

Where will we find the funding to achieve each goal?

The Guardian

A C.I.A. spokesman declined to discuss covert funding to Yemen.

The New York Times

It's unfair.' We need funding to do the work.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing financial backing, specify the source and purpose of the "funding to" provide clarity and context for your audience.

Common error

Avoid using "funding to" without specifying the recipient or purpose. For example, instead of saying "There's funding to education", specify "There's funding to primary education programs" for greater precision.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "funding to" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating the direction or recipient of financial resources. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used. The noun "funding" is modified by the preposition "to" clarifying where the money is going.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "funding to" is a grammatically correct and very common way to denote the allocation of financial resources towards a specific recipient or purpose. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely used across various contexts, including news, science, and formal communications. When using "funding to", ensure clarity by specifying both the source and the intended beneficiary. While phrases like "financial support for" or "grants for" can serve as alternatives, "funding to" remains a straightforward and effective choice for communicating resource allocation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

financial support for

Replaces "funding" with a more general term, emphasizing the act of providing financial assistance.

financial assistance towards

Similar to "financial support", but emphasizes the direction of the assistance.

grants for

Specifies the type of funding as grants, typically for specific projects or initiatives.

budget allocation for

Refers to a specific portion of a budget designated for a particular purpose.

monetary aid for

Emphasizes the provision of financial help, particularly in times of need.

investment in

Implies a longer-term commitment with the expectation of future returns or benefits.

subsidies for

Suggests government or organizational support to reduce costs or promote a specific activity.

allocation of resources for

Focuses on the strategic distribution of resources, not just financial ones.

capital infusion for

Highlights a significant injection of capital, often for a company or project.

sponsorship of

Suggests a more formal agreement where funding is provided in exchange for recognition or promotion.

FAQs

How can I use "funding to" in a sentence?

You can use "funding to" to indicate financial support directed towards a specific entity or cause. For example, "The government allocated "funding to" support renewable energy projects".

What are some alternatives to "funding to"?

Alternatives include "financial support for", "grants for", or "investment in" depending on the specific context.

Is "funding to" grammatically correct?

Yes, "funding to" is grammatically correct and commonly used to denote the direction of financial resources. However, make sure the context is clear and the sentence is well-structured.

What is the difference between "funding to" and "funding for"?

"Funding to" emphasizes the recipient or target of the funds, while "funding for" emphasizes the purpose. For example, "funding to universities" versus "funding for research".