funded in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "funded in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the source or method of financial support for a project, initiative, or organization. Example: "The research project was funded in part by a government grant."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Reproductive health projects were least funded in 2006 (19.5%), and most funded in 2008 (56.5%).

Conflict and Health

How are the arts funded in France?

The Guardian - Arts

It is not funded in any way from taxes.

The Guardian

"I'm sure he'll be well funded in the fall.

The New Yorker

Creative work is often funded in a similar way.

The New Yorker

Research projects are also more lavishly funded in America.

The Economist

The government will tell us how it is being funded in the autumn statement.

The Guardian

I am also pleased to see the hedge-laying revival funded in part by government grants.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

So the facilities, 40 staff members and training are funded in an ingenious way.

The Guardian

"You've got a $600 million development fully funded in a recession.

The New York Times

The annual cost of the scheme will be funded in two ways.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the nuance of different verbs related to funding. "Financed" may emphasize the monetary aspect, while "supported" can encompass non-monetary aid as well.

Common error

Avoid vague statements like "the project was funded" without specifying who provided the funding. Always identify the funding source to ensure transparency and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "funded in" primarily functions as a passive verb construction indicating that a subject has received financial backing within a specific context. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various sentences.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

32%

News & Media

46%

Formal & Business

22%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "funded in" is a versatile construct used to indicate that something has received financial backing within a specific context. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its grammatical status is correct, and it's very common across various writing styles. Usage ranges from scientific research and news reporting to more formal business communication. When using "funded in", be sure to identify both the funding source and the relevant context to maintain clarity and precision. Alternatives include "financed by" and "supported by". Remember to avoid vague statements by always specifying the source to ensure transparency and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Financed by

Replaces "funded" with "financed", emphasizing the provision of money for a specific purpose.

Supported by

Emphasizes backing or assistance, whether financial or otherwise.

Subsidized by

Suggests partial financial assistance, often by a government.

Invested in

Focuses on the act of putting money into something with the expectation of a return.

Bankrolled by

Implies significant financial backing, often by a wealthy individual or organization.

Underwritten by

Commonly used in the context of insurance or financial guarantees.

Endowed by

Refers to a permanent fund or source of income provided to an institution or individual.

Sponsored by

Suggests financial support in exchange for advertising or promotional benefits.

Provided with funding by

A more verbose alternative, emphasizing the act of providing funds.

Awarded a grant by

Specifically indicates funding received through a grant program.

FAQs

How can I use "funded in" in a sentence?

You can use "funded in" to describe how a project, organization, or initiative receives its financial support. For example, "The study was "funded in" part by a grant from the NIH."

What are some alternatives to "funded in"?

Alternatives to "funded in" include "financed by", "supported by", or "subsidized by", depending on the specific context of the funding.

Is it correct to say "funding in" instead of "funded in"?

No, "funding in" is grammatically incorrect. "Funded in" is the correct phrase when describing something that has already received financial support.

What's the difference between "funded by" and "funded in"?

"Funded by" indicates the source of the funds (e.g., "funded by the government"), while "funded in" specifies the context or location where the funding is applied (e.g., "funded in three stages").