Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

fundamental lack

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fundamental lack" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a basic or essential absence of something important or necessary. Example: "The report highlighted a fundamental lack of resources that hindered the project's success."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There's a fundamental lack of trust.

News & Media

Independent

There is a fundamental lack of energy.

There is a fundamental lack of liability and transparency.

News & Media

The Guardian

But there's a fundamental lack of realism to the scenario.

But the strident style of this memorial reveals a fundamental lack of honesty.

Brandt's antsy demeanor and haunted eyes communicate his fundamental lack of ease in his skin.

News & Media

The New York Times

Sometimes this fundamental lack of erotic sympathy with his subject makes him come unstuck completely.

He once said addiction was a fundamental lack but has revised that view.

He never shied away from the sonatas' fundamental lack of sentimentality.

"Importantly though what is at the heart of the abuse is the fundamental lack of understanding around trans people.

News & Media

The Guardian

One could not say that she was devoid of feeling or had a fundamental lack of sympathy.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "fundamental lack", ensure the context clearly identifies what is missing and why its absence is significant. For example, "There is a fundamental lack of funding for the project, hindering its progress".

Common error

Avoid using "fundamental lack" to describe superficial or minor issues. Reserve it for situations where the absence truly impacts the foundation or core functionality. Overusing it diminishes its impact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fundamental lack" functions as a noun phrase, where "fundamental" modifies the noun "lack". It identifies a basic or essential deficiency. As Ludwig AI reports, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "fundamental lack" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to denote a significant deficiency or absence of something essential. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correct and usable in various contexts. The phrase is most frequently found in news and media sources, with a neutral to professional tone. When using "fundamental lack", ensure you clearly identify what is missing and why its absence matters. Consider alternatives like "basic deficiency" or "critical absence" to add nuance to your writing. The phrase is widely understood and adds weight to discussions about core issues and foundational problems.

FAQs

How can I use "fundamental lack" in a sentence?

You can use "fundamental lack" to describe a basic or essential absence of something important. For example, "The project failed due to a "fundamental lack" of planning".

What are some alternatives to "fundamental lack"?

Alternatives include "basic deficiency", "essential shortfall", or "critical absence". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "a fundamental lack of" or "fundamental lack of"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "a fundamental lack of" is more common when referring to a specific instance. However, it's often omitted for brevity when the meaning is clear from context.

What's the difference between "fundamental lack" and "serious lack"?

"Fundamental lack" emphasizes that the absence is foundational or essential, while "serious lack" simply indicates the absence is significant. They are similar, but "fundamental lack" implies a more critical deficiency.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: