Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
full with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'full with' is not correct in written English.
The correct phrase is 'full of.' For example, "The library was full of books."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
We have supped full with wonders.
News & Media
The restaurant was full with guests".
News & Media
It was already full with patients".
News & Media
Fill shaker half full with ice.
News & Media
His hands are full with the gun.
News & Media
Fill a shaker half full with ice.
News & Media
The moon's up, full, with halo.
News & Media
They're going to have their hands full with him.
News & Media
Bryant's Lakers have had their hands full with Denver.
News & Media
ThiShortlystheted simultaneously that Williams' eyes were razor-sharp and that basesr's control were't.
News & Media
He added, "The hallway is full with smoke.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "full of" instead of "full with". For example, say "The room was full of people" instead of "The room was full with people".
Common error
Avoid using "with" after "full". The correct preposition to indicate what something contains is "of". Saying "full with" is a common mistake that should be corrected to maintain grammatical accuracy.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "full with" is grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, the correct preposition to use after "full" is "of". Therefore, the intended function, to describe something containing a quantity of something else, is not achieved when using "full with".
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "full with" is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. The correct phrase is "full of". As Ludwig AI highlights, using "full with" is a common error that should be avoided. While there are numerous examples of "full with" in the provided search data, they represent incorrect or non-standard usage. Therefore, when writing or speaking, always opt for "full of" or alternative phrases like "filled with", "replete with", or "overflowing with" to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
full of
Replaces "with" with the correct preposition "of" to indicate containment.
filled with
Uses the verb "filled" to emphasize the action of becoming full, maintaining the preposition "with".
replete with
A more formal synonym for "full of", suggesting abundance.
overflowing with
Implies exceeding fullness, using a more dynamic verb and maintaining the preposition "with".
packed with
Suggests a tight or dense filling, emphasizing the quantity and compactness of the contents.
abundant in
Focuses on the quality of abundance rather than the state of being full, using the preposition "in".
brimming with
Similar to overflowing, but suggests a fullness close to the top edge.
teeming with
Indicates a state of being crowded or swarming, often used for living things.
laden with
Implies a heavy or burdensome fullness, often used for carrying a load.
saturated with
Indicates a state of being completely soaked or permeated.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say something is "full"?
The correct way is to use the preposition "of", as in "full of". For example, "The glass is full of water" is correct, while "The glass is full with water" is incorrect.
Is "full with" ever correct in English?
No, "full with" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. The correct phrasing is always "full of".
What are some alternatives to saying something is "full of"?
Alternatives include "filled with", "replete with", or "overflowing with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
How can I remember to use "full of" instead of "full with"?
Think of common phrases like "full of joy" or "full of energy". Remembering these common collocations can help reinforce the correct usage.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested