full scale of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "full scale of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the complete extent or range of something, often in contexts related to measurement, evaluation, or impact. Example: "The report provides a full scale of the environmental impact of the project, detailing every aspect from emissions to habitat disruption."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The full scale of the reshuffle has not been decided.

The Guardian

"I don't think they realise the full scale of the reception that awaits them.

The Guardian - Business

The statistics probably do not represent the full scale of violence nationally.

The Guardian

At the Vatican, Zhu took in the full scale of St. Peter's Square.

The New Yorker

He admitted he had witnessed the full scale of emotions in his two matches in charge.

The Guardian - Sport

The full scale of the task facing Whitehall will become clear.

The Guardian

With each inspection, the full scale of the lax standards becomes clearer.

The Guardian

This morning, the full scale of Boris Johnson's above-inflation transport fare rises was revealed.

The Guardian - Opinion

The full scale of the destruction was becoming apparent on Sunday.

The Guardian

As he spoke, the full scale of the killings began to emerge.

The Guardian

The investigation into the full scale of the scam and who has been involved is ongoing.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about abstract concepts or situations, prefer "full scale of" over more literal expressions like "size" or "quantity" for added emphasis.

Common error

Avoid using "full scale of" only when referring to physical sizes. While appropriate in some contexts, the phrase is more impactful when describing the entirety or complexity of non-physical elements like effects or consequences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "full scale of" functions as a determiner phrase used to specify the complete extent, magnitude, or scope of something. It adds emphasis to the comprehensive nature of whatever it modifies. Ludwig's examples confirm this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Science

19%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "full scale of" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase to indicate the complete extent or magnitude of something. As shown by Ludwig, it is frequently found in news and media sources, but is also acceptable in scientific or formal business writing. When using the phrase, ensure that it aligns with the intended emphasis on the comprehensiveness of the subject. Consider alternatives like "total extent of" or "complete magnitude of" to adjust the nuance of your writing. It's worth noting that Ludwig AI confirms the correctness and usability of this phrase in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

total extent of

Emphasizes the completeness of the reach or scope.

complete magnitude of

Focuses on the overall size and importance.

entire scope of

Highlights the breadth and range.

whole dimension of

Stresses the multifaceted nature.

overall breadth of

Highlights the wide-ranging aspect.

absolute reach of

Emphasizes the maximum coverage.

comprehensive grasp of

Focuses on a complete understanding.

detailed picture of

Indicates a thorough and elaborate view.

true measure of

Stresses the accurate assessment of.

real extent of

Focuses on the actual scope or degree.

FAQs

How can I use "full scale of" in a sentence?

You can use "full scale of" to describe the complete extent or magnitude of something. For example, "The investigation revealed the "full scale of" the fraud" or "We need to understand the "full scale of" the problem before we can address it".

What can I say instead of "full scale of"?

Alternatives include "total extent of", "complete magnitude of", or "entire scope of", depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "full scale of" in writing?

It is appropriate when you want to emphasize the comprehensive nature or complete extent of something, such as an investigation, problem, or project. Consider alternative formulations if you can be more concise, without loss of emphasis.

What's the difference between "full scale of" and "scope of"?

"Scope of" refers to the range or extent of something, while "full scale of" emphasizes the completeness or magnitude of that range. "Full scale of" suggests a more comprehensive assessment than simply "scope of".