full of evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "full of evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that contains a significant amount of proof or data supporting a claim or argument. Example: "The research paper was full of evidence that supported the hypothesis proposed by the authors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

STILL, the desert is, in fact, full of evidence of immigrants who have taken this chance.

The New York Times

"The poems [in the original Lyrical Ballads] are full of evidence of a very divided society.

The Guardian - Books

The house is remarkably neat, orderly and full of evidence of Mr. Dye's disciplined, project-oriented approach to life.

The New York Times

Pinker knows he's bucking the gloom-and-doom trend but he's got containers full of evidence for ammunition, plus backup from the cognitive and evolutionary scientists.

The Guardian - Books

"Looks like you have the work coming to you, perks of being the boss, huh?" he smiles, as he pats the boxes full of evidence.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

The city of Burke and Hare and Robert Louis Stevenson is full of evidence of Scotland's cultural obsession with evil and madness.

The Guardian - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

To be sure, the world of cancer therapy is now global and full of evidence-based protocols that claim international validity.

Bulletin of the History of Medicine

In addition, the full rules of evidence do not apply.

Princeton University

Oil majors now have a full body of evidence of what investors want.

The New York Times

Cooper, who is studying for a PhD at Sussex University while tutoring, was cross-examined for a full day of evidence.

The Guardian

Klagge draws on the full range of evidence, including Wittgenstein's published work, the complete Nachla?, correspondence, lectures, and conversations.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "full of evidence" to clearly indicate that there is ample support for a claim or argument. Ensure the evidence is relevant and credible to strengthen your point.

Common error

Avoid using "full of evidence" when the evidence is weak or circumstantial. Overstating the strength of the evidence can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "full of evidence" primarily functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun. It describes something as possessing an abundance of supporting information or proof. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

29%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "full of evidence" is a grammatically correct and commonly used adjectival phrase that signifies a substantial amount of supporting information. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s found across various domains, from news and media to scientific and academic writing. When using this phrase, make sure the evidence is indeed strong and relevant to avoid undermining your credibility. Alternatives such as "rich in proof" or "replete with evidence" can provide subtle variations in meaning. Remember to choose the phrase that best fits the context and the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rich in proof

Replaces "evidence" with "proof" and "full" with "rich", focusing on the abundance of verification.

replete with evidence

Substitutes "full" with "replete", suggesting a comprehensive presence of evidence.

abundant in evidence

Uses "abundant" instead of "full", emphasizing the plentiful nature of the evidence.

teeming with evidence

Employs "teeming" to indicate that the subject contains a large amount of evidence.

laden with evidence

Replaces "full" with "laden", implying a heavy presence of evidence.

flush with evidence

Substitutes "full" with "flush", suggesting a plentiful supply of evidence.

awash in evidence

Uses "awash" to imply that the evidence is overwhelmingly present.

packed with evidence

Replaces "full" with "packed", suggesting a high concentration of evidence.

loaded with evidence

Uses "loaded" to indicate a substantial amount of supporting information.

brimming with evidence

Substitutes "full" with "brimming", implying that the evidence is overflowing.

FAQs

How can I use "full of evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "full of evidence" to describe something that contains a significant amount of proof. For example, "The report was "full of evidence" supporting the claim."

What are some alternatives to "full of evidence"?

Alternatives include "rich in proof", "replete with evidence", or "abundant in evidence", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "full of evidence" or "full with evidence"?

"Full of evidence" is the correct and more common phrasing. "Full with evidence" is grammatically incorrect.

What does it mean when something is described as "full of evidence"?

It means that it contains a large quantity of data, facts, or information that supports a particular claim, argument, or conclusion.