full of discrepancies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "full of discrepancies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that contains many inconsistencies or errors, often in a context where accuracy is important. Example: "The report was full of discrepancies, making it difficult to trust the findings presented."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

The document was so full of discrepancies that the ombudsman eventually disregarded it entirely.

The Guardian

Mr. Morgenthau's report stated they were so full of discrepancies and errors regarding the rape as to make them implausible as evidence.

The New York Times

In many cases, he said, the government cannot identify potential conflicts because committee membership lists are unusable — incomplete, inaccurate and full of discrepancies.

The New York Times

The court motion said records submitted by the police in Richmond, Va., where Mr. Brown claimed to have completed his sentence, were full of discrepancies and showed the singer had been unsupervised for most of the time.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Assessment of discrepancies in outcome selection between systematic review protocols and full reviews.

BMJ Open

During completion of the risk-of-bias assessment for the full set of studies, discrepancies between the reviewers are resolved by reaching agreement through discussion.

Environmental Health Perspectives

(b)Listing of discrepancies and placards.

Cornell University

These sorts of discrepancies, experts say, happen regularly.

The Washington Post

Various sources of discrepancies are discussed.

Engineering Structures

Analysis of discrepancies in SNF3.

BMC Systems Biology

Be aware of discrepancies.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "full of discrepancies", ensure you can provide specific examples of those discrepancies to support your claim and enhance credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "full of discrepancies" lightly; reserve it for situations where the inconsistencies are significant and numerous, not just minor oversights.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "full of discrepancies" primarily functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun to describe its state or condition. It indicates that something contains numerous inconsistencies or contradictions, as seen in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

30%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "full of discrepancies" is a grammatically sound and usable expression, albeit not overly common, used to describe something that contains many inconsistencies or errors. As per Ludwig, this phrase sees use across various contexts, including news, science, and academia. While versatile, ensuring context-specific relevance and provision of supporting examples strengthens your claims. Alternatives such as "riddled with inconsistencies" and "replete with contradictions" can be used for nuanced expression. Using this expression judiciously enhances the credibility of your analysis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

riddled with inconsistencies

Emphasizes a pervasive presence of inconsistencies.

replete with contradictions

Highlights the presence of contradictory elements.

abounding in errors

Focuses on the high number of errors present.

fraught with inaccuracies

Stresses the unreliability and lack of precision.

teeming with mistakes

Highlights the abundance of mistakes present.

awash in incongruities

Emphasizes the strange or out-of-place elements.

marked by deviations

Focuses on the presence of noticeable departures from what is expected.

characterized by irregularities

Indicates a lack of uniformity or consistency.

beset by anomalies

Highlights unusual or unexpected occurrences that are problematic.

suffering from defects

Focuses on the flaws and imperfections.

FAQs

How can I use "full of discrepancies" in a sentence?

You can use "full of discrepancies" to describe documents, reports, or accounts that contain numerous inconsistencies. For example, "The witness's statement was "full of discrepancies", raising doubts about its accuracy."

What are some alternatives to "full of discrepancies"?

Alternatives include "riddled with inconsistencies", "replete with contradictions", or "abounding in errors". The best choice depends on the specific context and the type of inconsistencies you want to emphasize.

Is it better to say "full of discrepancies" or "full of inconsistencies"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. "Full of discrepancies" might be preferred when referring to factual errors or conflicting details, while "full of inconsistencies" can apply more broadly to logical or argumentative flaws.

What's the difference between "full of discrepancies" and "containing errors"?

"Full of discrepancies" suggests a higher degree of contradiction and conflict between different pieces of information. "Containing errors" is a more general term that simply indicates the presence of mistakes, which may or may not be mutually exclusive.