full of deficiencies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "full of deficiencies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has many flaws or shortcomings. Example: "The report was full of deficiencies, making it difficult to trust the conclusions drawn."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

"But I am full of deficiencies like this, because I have been so focused on my own work that it's shut out a lot of other things".

The Guardian - Books

The Court of Cassation's judges sharply criticised the appeals court, saying its ruling had been full of "deficiencies, contradictions and illogical" conclusions.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Both of these paragraphs are full of delightfully constructed phrases that at once tantalize with the possibility of discovery and cover for potential informational deficiencies.

TechCrunch

Full rails, full of coal.

The New York Times

Whatever its deficiencies, it has an appealing sweep, which Mr. Rothman and his players brought to life nicely, and its two movements are full of appealing ideas that a more experienced symphonist might have exploited more fully.

The New York Times - Arts

"Full of crumbled pyramids.

The New York Times

Full of grace.

The New York Times

"Full of clinkers.

The New Yorker

Still full of beans?

BBC

Romantically full of action?

WikiHow

The full or parcial deficiency of thyroid hormone action is called hypothyroidism, which can be either overt (OH) or subclinical (SCH).

BMC Endocrine Disorders

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "full of deficiencies", ensure that the context clearly identifies what is lacking or imperfect. Be specific to enhance clarity.

Common error

While grammatically correct, "full of deficiencies" can sound informal or overly critical in professional or academic writing. Consider using more nuanced and objective language to maintain a balanced tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "full of deficiencies" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that something has many flaws or shortcomings. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "full of deficiencies" is a grammatically correct adjective phrase used to describe something that has many flaws or shortcomings. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. While not overly common, it appears in diverse contexts, including news media, science, and encyclopedias. The phrase functions to critique and highlight imperfections. When writing, consider whether a more nuanced or objective term would be more appropriate for formal contexts. Alternatives like "replete with flaws" or "abounding in shortcomings" can provide similar meaning with slightly different emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

replete with flaws

Emphasizes abundance of flaws.

abounding in shortcomings

Highlights the plentiful nature of the shortcomings.

riddled with imperfections

Implies that imperfections are widespread and pervasive.

marked by inadequacies

Focuses on the presence and impact of inadequacies.

characterized by faults

Highlights the defining characteristic of having faults.

beset with weaknesses

Suggests being troubled or plagued by weaknesses.

lacking in perfection

Emphasizes the absence of perfection.

fraught with limitations

Highlights the presence of significant limitations.

tainted with errors

Implies that errors have a negative impact.

compromised by failings

Suggests that failings have weakened or undermined something.

FAQs

How can I use "full of deficiencies" in a sentence?

You can use "full of deficiencies" to describe something that has many flaws or shortcomings. For example, "The initial draft was "full of deficiencies", requiring significant revisions".

What are some alternatives to saying "full of deficiencies"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "replete with flaws", "abounding in shortcomings", or "riddled with imperfections".

Is it better to say "full of deficiencies" or "lacking sufficient qualities"?

Both phrases are valid, but "full of deficiencies" implies the presence of multiple specific flaws, while "lacking sufficient qualities" suggests a more general absence of desired attributes.

What's the difference between "full of deficiencies" and "containing errors"?

"Full of deficiencies" implies more fundamental shortcomings or lacks, while "containing errors" focuses specifically on factual mistakes or inaccuracies. Therefore, "containing errors" could be less serious than ""full of deficiencies"".