free of liability

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "free of liability" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase in any context in which someone or something is relieved of responsibility or not held accountable for something. For example, "The company released the worker from all liability for damages related to the incident."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

So he wants Grokster to be free of liability even if individual file sharers should be punished.

MIT Technology Review

The Communications Decency Act of 1996 leaves online companies free of liability for transmitting most kinds of unlawful material supplied by others.

The New York Times

We can see no reason to doubt that under Louisiana law the maintenance of navigation lights, if permissible, by municipalities would likewise be free of liability.

Cornell University

So American companies have tried to carve out a compromise that keeps them free of liability from European lawsuits if they promise to regulate themselves -- a move that some European legislators say will lead to weaker standards.

The New York Times - Tech

They may also make it more likely that partners in the United States will ultimately decide to take the firm into bankruptcy, with the goal of selling its assets free of liability under the supervision of a bankruptcy court judge.

The New York Times

Thirdly, the court concedes that the Petitioner's conduct is likely grossly negligent, but because the Respondent Getty could not prove that American Express had actual knowledge of the fraud, American Express is free of liability.

Cornell University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

"Generally speaking, you take those assets free of liabilities," he said.

The New York Times

The company is looking to sell well-known names through something called a "363 sale," which would allow assets to be sold free of liabilities.

Forbes

Free of criminal liability, Mr. Callahan then sued the officers for violating his rights under the Fourth Amendment.

The New York Times

But it did not leave Geneva completely free of legal liability; Abbott could still sue for patent infringement once the generic capsules came to market.

The New York Times

"It's a new area and those individuals who thought they were going to be free of any liability because their real names are not attached to the notices are going to find out that is not the case".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When drafting contracts or legal documents, clearly define the scope of the term "free of liability" to avoid ambiguity. Specify which actions or events are covered by the liability waiver.

Common error

Avoid using overly broad or vague language in liability waivers. Ensure that the waiver specifically identifies the potential risks and activities for which liability is being waived. Overly broad waivers may be unenforceable in court.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "free of liability" functions as a predicate adjective, modifying a noun or pronoun to describe a state of being exempt from legal or financial responsibility. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

33%

Science

8%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "free of liability" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate exemption from legal or financial responsibility. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is indeed correct. It frequently appears in news, media, and academic contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that the context and scope of the liability waiver are clearly defined to avoid potential misinterpretations. Related phrases include "exempt from liability", "immune from liability", and "not liable", offering alternative ways to express the same concept. This phrase is considered neutral to formal and its formality depends on the context. The most authoritative source are The New York Times and Forbes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

exempt from liability

Replaces "free" with "exempt", implying a formal release from obligation.

immune from liability

Uses "immune" to suggest protection against liability.

not liable

A direct statement of non-responsibility.

absolved of liability

Implies a formal release from blame or responsibility.

released from liability

Focuses on the action of being freed from responsibility.

without liability

Indicates a lack of responsibility in a given situation.

clear of liability

Suggests being cleared or acquitted of potential responsibility.

not accountable

Emphasizes the lack of accountability for actions or outcomes.

unaccountable

A more concise way to state lack of accountability.

indemnified against liability

Suggests protection from financial loss or legal claims.

FAQs

How can I use "free of liability" in a sentence?

You can use "free of liability" to indicate that someone or something is not responsible for potential damages or legal claims. For example, "The Communications Decency Act leaves online companies "free of liability" for transmitting unlawful material".

What's the difference between "free of liability" and "exempt from liability"?

"Free of liability" generally means not responsible or accountable, while "exempt from liability" implies a specific and formal release from a potential obligation. The level of formality differs.

What can I say instead of "free of liability"?

You can use alternatives like "not liable", "immune from liability", or "absolved of liability" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "free from liability" instead of "free of liability"?

Both ""free of liability"" and "free from liability" are grammatically correct. However, ""free of liability"" is the more commonly used phrase.