found evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "found evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the discovery or identification of proof or information that supports a claim or argument. Example: "After conducting extensive research, the team found evidence that supports their hypothesis about climate change."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

They found evidence of cannibalism.

The New York Times

I've found evidence.

The Guardian - Books

He also found evidence of wide destruction.

The New York Times

None found evidence of a clot.

The New York Times - Magazine

The authors found evidence of both choices.

The New York Times

Had I found evidence of sexism?

The New York Times - Tech

They have found evidence of biophilia everywhere.

The New York Times - Science

Mr. Joskow says he has found evidence.

The New York Times

Perhaps they found evidence of my politics in the pages.

The New York Times

Other tests found evidence of the simian virus.

The New York Times - Science

They have also found evidence which suggests automatic deletion.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "found evidence", clearly specify what the evidence supports to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of just saying "They found evidence", say "They found evidence of tampering".

Common error

Avoid using "found evidence" without specifying the nature or source of the evidence. This can weaken your statement and make it less credible. Instead of stating "Evidence was found", provide details such as "DNA evidence was found at the crime scene".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "found evidence" serves as a verbal phrase that introduces or highlights factual information or data that supports a claim, hypothesis, or argument. Ludwig AI confirms its common and correct usage in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Science

21%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "found evidence" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that denotes the discovery of facts supporting a claim or argument. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It's versatile across multiple contexts, including news, science, and general discourse. When employing this phrase, be clear about the evidence's nature and the claim it supports to maximize clarity and credibility. Alternatives such as "uncovered proof" or "discovered confirmation" can add nuance. The phrase is widely accepted and understood, making it a valuable tool in effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

uncovered proof

Focuses on the act of revealing previously hidden proof.

discovered confirmation

Emphasizes finding something that validates or supports an existing belief or theory.

identified substantiation

Highlights the process of recognizing and establishing something as valid.

detected indications

Suggests a less definitive finding, implying the presence of signs or clues.

ascertained facts

Focuses on establishing true information through investigation.

established validation

Emphasizes confirming the accuracy or legitimacy of something.

unearthed data

Highlights the retrieval of information through investigation or research.

revealed verification

Implies making something known that confirms or proves something.

determined validation

Emphasizes reaching a conclusion that confirms the truth or accuracy of something.

observed confirmation

Focuses on noting something that supports or verifies a claim.

FAQs

How can I use "found evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "found evidence" to indicate the discovery of proof supporting a claim. For example, "The investigators "found evidence" linking the suspect to the crime scene".

What are some alternatives to saying "found evidence"?

Alternatives include "uncovered proof", "discovered confirmation", or "identified substantiation", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "found evidence for" or "found evidence of"?

"Found evidence of" is generally preferred when the evidence directly relates to something. For example, "They "found evidence of" fraud". "Found evidence for" works when the evidence supports a particular theory or argument.

What is the difference between "evidence was found" and "they found evidence"?

"Evidence was found" is a passive construction, while "they "found evidence"" is active. The active voice is often stronger and clearer because it specifies who found the evidence.