form subgroups

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "form subgroups" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the creation or organization of smaller groups within a larger group, often in academic, social, or organizational settings. Example: "To enhance collaboration, we will form subgroups based on each member's expertise."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

In organizational management, researchers and managers study separations or faultlines that occur in diverse teams when members form subgroups based on the alignment of multiple demographic characteristics.

Computers & Graphics

The miners will probably form subgroups involving people with similar interests and values from whom they can receive solace when they feel angry at someone else.

The New York Times

8 patients proved to be septic and 7 non-septic, which was sufficient to form subgroups.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Unlike ATIPE, ACI does not require a researcher to change institutes, and many ACI recipients have chosen to form "subgroups" within an already existing laboratory.

Science Magazine

But researchers have found that female bats, like humans and elephants, form subgroups that stick together over long periods of time.

Science Magazine

We form subgroups: One of those is dealing with climate change and food security issues, and another subgroup we're planning for the back end of the autumn is going to be dealing with infectious diseases.

Science Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

But Zhang told me that, in the places where he delivered, people were increasingly forming subgroups determined by their possessions.

The New Yorker

Just within the lung cancer community, patients are forming subgroups around their specific cancer types.

Forbes

By contrast, the merozoite antigens generally had lower levels of among and within region differentiation and gene flow, and haplotypes formed subgroups independent of geographic origin with uniformly high levels of within population diversity.

Plosone

In contrast, profile regression identified combinations of covariates that formed subgroups associated with higher or lower risks.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Within the individual Dact groups, sarcopterygian and actinopterygian Dact sequences formed subgroups, particularly evident in the rooted trees (Additional file 4).

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about teams or organizations, clarify the purpose and criteria used to "form subgroups" to ensure transparency and understanding.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by clearly stating the rationale behind the decision to "form subgroups". Indicate the specific goals or objectives that these subgroups are intended to achieve.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "form subgroups" functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of creating smaller, more specialized groups within a larger entity. As Ludwig AI points out, this is a grammatically correct and usable expression.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

23%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "form subgroups" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that describes the creation of smaller groups within a larger whole. According to Ludwig AI, its usage is appropriate across different settings, including science, news, and professional environments. When using this phrase, it's best practice to clarify the purpose and criteria for subgroup formation. Related phrases, such as "establish subgroups" and "create subgroups", offer nuanced alternatives for expressing this concept. Therefore, you can confidently use the phrase "form subgroups" in your writing, provided that you maintain clarity and context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

establish subgroups

Focuses on the act of setting up or founding the subgroups.

create subgroups

Emphasizes the action of bringing the subgroups into existence.

develop subgroups

Suggests a process of growth or evolution of the subgroups.

organize into subgroups

Highlights the structuring and arrangement of the subgroups.

divide into subgroups

Focuses on the splitting or separation of a larger group.

categorize into subgroups

Implies a process of classifying members into smaller groups.

assemble subgroups

Suggests gathering members to create distinct subgroups.

group into subcategories

Highlights the creation of smaller categories within a larger group.

break down into subgroups

Emphasizes the decomposition of a larger group into smaller units.

constitute subgroups

Suggests that subgroups are being composed or made up of individuals.

FAQs

How can I use "form subgroups" in a sentence?

You can use "form subgroups" to describe the creation of smaller, more focused groups within a larger organization or team. For instance, "To address the diverse challenges, the committee decided to "form subgroups" specializing in different areas".

What are some alternatives to "form subgroups"?

Some alternatives to "form subgroups" include "establish subgroups", "create subgroups", or "organize into subgroups", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "form subgroups" or "create subgroups"?

Both "form subgroups" and "create subgroups" are grammatically correct and widely used. The choice depends on the desired emphasis; "form" suggests organization, while "create" emphasizes the act of bringing something new into existence.

What is the difference between "form subgroups" and "divide into subgroups"?

"Form subgroups" typically implies creating groups based on shared characteristics or goals, whereas "divide into subgroups" suggests a separation of a larger group into smaller units, potentially without specific shared attributes.