for we have

USAGE SUMMARY

"for we have" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used to indicate that the speaker or writer is in possession of something, or that they are aware of something. For example, "We are confident in this plan's success, for we have the resources necessary to make it happen."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

FORGIVE us, voters, for we have sinned.

The Economist

For we have no time to spare!

The New York Times

For we have got work to do.

The Guardian

For we have been CGI'd by GOD!

Independent

Also, for, we have.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

For, we have.

Complex Analysis and its Synergies

For, we have ; thus.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Furthermore, for, we have.

Boundary Value Problems

Then, for, we have.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Next, for, we have.

Boundary Value Problems

Similarly, for, we have.

Boundary Value Problems

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "for we have" to introduce a justification or reason that directly supports a preceding statement. Ensure the connection between the clauses is clear and logical.

Common error

Avoid using "for we have" in excessively complex or convoluted sentences where the causal relationship becomes unclear. In such cases, simpler conjunctions like "because" or "since" might provide better clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for we have" functions as a subordinating conjunction, introducing a clause that provides a reason or explanation for the preceding statement. As Ludwig indicates, it introduces a cause or justification.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for we have" is a grammatically correct conjunction phrase used to introduce a reason or justification. Ludwig AI confirms its validity in written English. It's most commonly found in scientific and news-related contexts, although its overall frequency is rare. When writing, it's important to ensure that the causal link between the clauses connected by "for we have" is clear and logical. Consider that more modern alternatives may be more appropriate depending on the context and formality of the sentence, which is one way to avoid misuse of the phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

because we possess

Replaces 'for' with 'because' and 'have' with 'possess' to create a more explicit causal relationship.

due to the fact we have

Emphasizes the causal relationship using 'due to the fact' for added emphasis.

given that we hold

Uses 'given that' for a more formal introduction and 'hold' as a synonym for 'have'.

since we are in possession of

Emphasizes the state of possessing something using a more formal tone.

as we are equipped with

Focuses on being 'equipped with' something, suggesting resources or capabilities.

considering we've got

Uses a more informal contraction 'we've got' and 'considering' as the introductory conjunction.

seeing as we own

Employs 'seeing as' for a more conversational tone and 'own' to indicate possession.

in light of our having

A more formal and elaborate way to express the reason based on possession.

on account of us having

A less common but still valid way of indicating a reason based on possession.

we are privileged to have

Highlights a sense of privilege or fortunate possession.

FAQs

How can I use "for we have" in a sentence?

Use "for we have" to introduce a reason or explanation. For example: "We are confident in our success, "for we have" a solid plan."

What can I say instead of "for we have"?

You can use alternatives like "because we have", "since we have", or "as we have" depending on the context. The most suitable option will depend on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always correct to use "for we have" in formal writing?

While grammatically correct, "for we have" might sound slightly archaic in some contexts. Consider whether a more modern alternative like "because" or "since" would be more appropriate for your audience and purpose.

What's the difference between "for we have" and "because we have"?

"For we have" introduces a reason that is often perceived as secondary or supportive, whereas "because we have" typically introduces the primary and direct cause. Also, the word "for" sounds more formal than "because".