for water

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for water" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are specifying a purpose or reason related to water, such as in requests or explanations. Example: "I need to buy a filter for water to ensure it's clean and safe to drink."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

People were fighting for water.

The New Yorker

Mr. Buteau asked for water.

The New York Times

Dress for water and weather.

The New York Times

Consumer Council for Water.

The Guardian

"For water, though".

The Guardian - Business

Everyone desperate for water.

The New York Times

Some begged for water.

The New York Times

Always asked for water".

The New York Times

Knock holes in the ice for water.

The New York Times

"People will not pay for water.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

By the Numbers: Unaccounted-For Water.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When specifying a reason or intention involving water, use "for water" to clearly indicate the purpose, such as "a filter for water" to ensure it is safe to drink.

Common error

Ensure clarity by specifying the type of water when needed; instead of saying "I need a container for water", be more specific with "I need a container for drinking water" or "I need a container for irrigation water" to avoid confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for water" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun or verb to indicate purpose, need, or relation. Ludwig examples show its use in contexts ranging from specifying containers to describing necessities.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Wiki

29%

Science

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for water" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed prepositional phrase. Ludwig AI affirms its proper usage across various contexts. Its primary function is to specify a purpose, need, or relationship involving water, appearing most commonly in news, media, and wiki sources. To ensure clarity, especially in writing, it's important to specify the type of water where needed. Overall, "for water" is a reliable and versatile phrase for effectively communicating about water-related topics.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

about water

Offers a general reference to water, suitable for broad discussions or information.

related to water

Broadly connects ideas or items to water, suitable for various contexts.

concerning water

Indicates a topic of concern or discussion centered on water.

regarding water

Highlights the subject of water, indicating a focus on discussion or consideration.

in connection with water

Highlights a relationship or association with water, emphasizing a link between elements.

in relation to water

Emphasizes a connection or association with water, focusing on context or relevance.

on the subject of water

Highlights water as the specific topic, useful in formal or academic settings.

pertaining to water

Suggests a direct relevance or connection to water, often in a formal context.

in terms of water

Focuses on evaluating or considering something from the perspective of water.

with respect to water

Indicates consideration of water in relation to something else, often in a formal manner.

FAQs

How can I use "for water" in a sentence?

You can use "for water" to specify a purpose or reason related to water, such as "This is a special container "for water storage"" or "They were desperate "for water supply"".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "for water"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "regarding water", "related to water", or specifying the type such as "for drinking water".

Is it always necessary to use "for water", or can I sometimes omit it?

While "for water" is grammatically correct, consider whether the context already implies that water is the subject. Sometimes, using just "water" is sufficient if the meaning is clear from the surrounding words. For example, instead of "supplies for water", you might say "water supplies".

What's the difference between "for water" and "about water"?

"For water" typically indicates a purpose or reason connected to water. "About water", on the other hand, is used to discuss or provide information concerning water as a general topic. For instance, "This project is "about water conservation"", discusses water conservation as a topic.