Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
for valuable discussions
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "for valuable discussions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express appreciation for engaging conversations or exchanges of ideas that are considered beneficial or insightful. Example: "I would like to thank everyone for valuable discussions during the conference that helped shape our future strategies."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
We thank O. Reshef for valuable discussions.
Science & Research
Weng and T. Xiang for valuable discussions.
Science & Research
for valuable discussions on the model.
Academia
We thank M. Oppenheimer for valuable discussions on the manuscript.
Science & Research
The authors thank G. Bartal for valuable discussions.
Science & Research
The authors kindly thank Ruslan Temirov for valuable discussions.
Science & Research
The authors are grateful for valuable discussions with Prof. Dieter Braun and Prof. Erwin Frey.
Science & Research
We acknowledge D. Archer and L. A. Brown for valuable discussions.
Science & Research
and S.M.H. thank R. F. Berger and K. Lee for valuable discussions.
Science & Research
We also thank L. K. Clayton for valuable discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.
Science & Research
We thank J.F.M. Valls, C. Simpson and G. Seijo for valuable discussions.
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When expressing gratitude in academic or professional writing, using "for valuable discussions" is a clear and concise way to acknowledge the helpful input and insights you received. Be specific by naming the individuals who contributed.
Common error
Avoid simply stating "for valuable discussions" without providing context or naming contributors. Add details about what made the discussions valuable or who provided particularly helpful insights to make your acknowledgment more meaningful.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "for valuable discussions" functions as a prepositional phrase used in the acknowledgments section of academic papers, reports, and other formal documents. It expresses gratitude to individuals who provided helpful input, feedback, or insights.
Frequent in
Science
74%
Academia
24%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "for valuable discussions" is a standard and well-accepted way to express gratitude for helpful input in academic and professional settings. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and very commonly used, particularly in scientific and academic publications. When using the phrase, it's important to be specific about who you are thanking and, if possible, what made their input particularly valuable. Alternative phrases such as "for insightful conversations" or "for productive exchanges" can add variety to your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
for insightful conversations
Replaces "discussions" with "conversations" and "valuable" with "insightful", focusing on the depth of understanding gained.
for productive exchanges
Emphasizes the outcome and efficiency of the discussions, highlighting their contribution to progress.
for meaningful dialogues
Highlights the depth and significance of the conversations, implying that they were substantial and impactful.
for helpful insights
Focuses on the valuable information and perspectives gained, rather than the discussions themselves.
for beneficial consultations
Suggests a more formal and expert-driven exchange, emphasizing the positive impact of the advice received.
for illuminating conversations
Highlights the enlightening and clarifying nature of the discussions.
for informative exchanges
Emphasizes the educational aspect of the discussions, where knowledge and information were shared.
for precious feedback
Shifts the focus to the feedback received during the discussions, emphasizing its importance and value.
for significant input
Highlights the importance and impact of the contributions made during the discussions.
for strategic advice
Indicates that the discussions provided guidance that was carefully planned and effective.
FAQs
How can I use "for valuable discussions" in a sentence?
You can use "for valuable discussions" to express gratitude in academic papers, reports, or presentations. For example, "We thank Dr. Smith "for valuable discussions" on the experimental design."
What's a more formal alternative to "for valuable discussions"?
In very formal contexts, consider using phrases like "for insightful deliberations" or "for their invaluable contributions to our understanding" to convey a similar sentiment with a more elevated tone.
What can I say instead of "for valuable discussions" to acknowledge help?
You can use alternatives like "for insightful conversations", "for productive exchanges", or "for meaningful dialogues" depending on the specific context.
Is it appropriate to use "for valuable discussions" in a scientific paper?
Yes, it's common and appropriate to use "for valuable discussions" in the acknowledgments section of a scientific paper to thank colleagues who provided helpful feedback or insights.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested