for substantial enough

USAGE SUMMARY

"for substantial enough" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something is significant or large enough in size or amount. For example, "He saved for substantial enough funds to start his own business."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Lessons from Uganda include the need for substantial enough incentives directly tied to results, autonomy for health facilities to make decisions and to use resources, and rigorous verification of results [ 37].

BMC Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Excellent for kids, but not quite substantial enough for adults.

Independent

But he found that buyers were often unable or unwilling to roll the cost (an extra $24,000 for an array substantial enough to fully power a house) into their mortgages.

The New York Times

Military leaders and President Obama's civilian advisers are girding for battle over the size and pace of the planned pullout of U.S. troops from Afghanistan this summer, with the military seeking to limit a reduction in combat forces and the White House pressing for a withdrawal substantial enough to placate a war-weary electorate.

The Washington Post

Nevertheless, the potential for Cuba is substantial enough that it warrants attention from both investors and speculators.

Forbes

Nevertheless, cough threshold exhibited differential change for capsaicin (C5 more pronounced than C2) but for citric acid not substantial enough to reach significance.

Cough

None are substantial enough for turkey.

The New York Times - Food

Entrees are larger than tapas size but not quite substantial enough for a full meal.

The New York Times

Greek Chicken and Tomato Salad: A tomato-centric Greek salad that is substantial enough for lunch or a light supper.

The New York Times

I am happy enough to offer only one accompaniment here, a red salad that is substantial enough for even heavy eaters.

The New York Times

It doesn't help that Mr. Wyle and Mr. Patton, as warriors of varying degrees of enthusiasm, don't feel substantial enough for their roles.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider stronger synonyms like 'sufficient' or 'adequate' depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. These may improve conciseness and impact.

Common error

While grammatically correct, "for substantial enough" can sound somewhat awkward in very formal contexts. Opt for more concise alternatives such as 'sufficient for' to maintain a sophisticated tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for substantial enough" functions as a qualifier, indicating that something meets a necessary threshold of size, quantity, or impact. Ludwig AI confirms its usability as a means to describe adequacy.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for substantial enough" serves as a qualifier, indicating that something possesses the necessary degree of size, quantity, or impact to meet a particular need or achieve a desired result. While grammatically correct and confirmed by Ludwig AI as usable, its frequency is rare, suggesting it's not a common choice in writing. It finds its place in neutral contexts across News & Media and Science, although sometimes more concise alternatives may be preferred in formal settings. Using synonyms such as "sufficient for" or "adequate for" can sometimes improve clarity and conciseness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficient for

Replaces 'substantial enough' with 'sufficient', implying adequacy for a purpose.

adequate for

Substitutes 'substantial enough' with 'adequate', suggesting a satisfactory level.

large enough for

Focuses on size rather than substance, changing the emphasis slightly.

sufficiently substantial for

Inverts the order and adds an adverb, emphasizing the degree of substance.

big enough for

More informal than 'large enough', but conveys a similar meaning of sufficient size.

significant enough for

Highlights the importance or significance, rather than the size or amount.

considerable enough for

Suggests that something is worthy of consideration because it is large or important.

ample enough for

Implies a generous or more than sufficient amount.

good enough for

A more general and less precise way of saying something meets requirements.

suitable for

Focuses on appropriateness or fitness for a specific purpose.

FAQs

How can I use "for substantial enough" in a sentence?

You can use "for substantial enough" to indicate that something is adequate or significant to achieve a particular purpose or meet a specific need. For example, 'The budget needs to be "large enough" for substantial improvements to the infrastructure'.

What are some alternatives to "for substantial enough"?

Alternatives include "sufficient for", "adequate for", or "large enough for", depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

Is it more appropriate to use "for substantial enough" or "sufficient for"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "sufficient for" is often considered more concise and may be preferred in formal writing. "For substantial enough" emphasizes the degree or amount of substance.

What does "for substantial enough" imply about the subject?

It implies that the subject possesses a quality or quantity that is significant and capable of achieving a desired outcome or satisfying a specific requirement. It suggests the subject has a notable size, amount, or impact "sufficient enough" for purpose.