for stronger access

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for stronger access" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the need for improved or enhanced access to something, such as information, resources, or services. Example: "We are implementing new security measures for stronger access to our database, ensuring that only authorized personnel can retrieve sensitive information."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

If student numbers for 2012 are significantly down on 2011 figures, (as we now know they have) there will be growing Lib Dem and Labour pressure for stronger access regulation that will be resisted by universities.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Stronger access to service providers.

FAO

To secure availability, it is required to limit other actions than essential functions and grant rights for functional access by making strong access control [7, 11, 16, 19].

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

During meetings with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, and with Israeli Minister of Social Welfare Isaac Herzog and the head of the Israeli Supreme Court, she stressed the need for stronger protection and unimpeded access of humanitarian supplies and personnel into Gaza.

Unicef

The transitions between these regulatory states are initiated by Ca2+ binding to TnC, which switches TnI from an inhibitory to a permissive position thereby permitting Tm movement and access for strong force generating cross-bridges.

Plosone

Hybrid spread-spectrum (HSS) systems, which combine direct-sequence (DS) and frequency-hopping (FH) spread-spectrum (SS) techniques, are attractive for their strong multiple-access capabilities, resistance to multipath fading and intentional/unintentional jamming, and the security they provide against eavesdroppers [1-6].

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Recently, strong evidence for access to mammoth meat has been described at the Pit 1 locality.

Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

Despite being in an initial phase, this policy framework has potential to become an integral part of real-time distributed systems in future, where there is a strong need for access, identity and resource management abilities.

Journal of Cloud Computing

Given this result, the access internalist should, and no doubt would, opt for strong awareness, encapsulated here in strong AJI.

SEP

However, he added that the case for open access was stronger for some disciplines, such as climate research, than others.

The Guardian

Paul Stancil, an assistant law professor at the University of Illinois, said that even if the Mets' lawyers needed the evidence to bolster their defense, "they may need a stronger argument for quicker access, like if they were legitimately worried that witnesses might be unavailable".

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for stronger access", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being accessed and why the enhancement is necessary. For example, specify "for stronger access to data" or "for stronger access to healthcare services".

Common error

Avoid using "for stronger access" without specifying what the access relates to. Vague statements can lead to confusion; always clarify the target of the access and the intended benefits of strengthening it.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for stronger access" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a verb or noun. It indicates the reason or purpose behind an action, specifically to enhance or improve access to something. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

34%

Formal & Business

34%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for stronger access" serves as a prepositional phrase indicating the purpose of enhancing or reinforcing the means by which something is obtained or utilized. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It is commonly used across news, scientific, and formal business contexts, denoting actions taken to improve access to resources, information, or opportunities. To ensure clarity, it's crucial to specify what the access pertains to. Alternatives like "for improved access" or "to enhance accessibility" offer similar meanings, each with subtle differences. By following best practices and avoiding vagueness, writers can effectively convey the intent behind seeking "for stronger access".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to improve access

A more direct and simplified way of saying the same thing.

for increased access

Emphasizes the quantitative aspect of access, focusing on making it more available.

to enhance accessibility

Focuses more on improving the overall ease of use and availability.

for a more secure access

Specifically highlights security aspects of the access being provided.

to bolster access

Similar to reinforce, but with a slightly stronger connotation of support.

to reinforce access

Suggests strengthening existing access points or methods.

to solidify access

Implies making access more permanent or stable.

for fortified access

Indicates making access more secure and protected.

to streamline access

Focuses on making the access process more efficient and less cumbersome.

for unrestricted access

Emphasizes the absence of limitations or barriers to access.

FAQs

How can I use "for stronger access" in a sentence?

You can use "for stronger access" to describe efforts to improve or enhance the means by which something is obtained or used. For instance, "The company implemented new security protocols "for stronger access" to sensitive data".

What are some alternatives to "for stronger access"?

Some alternatives include "for improved access", "to enhance accessibility", or "for increased access", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to specify what the access refers to when using "for stronger access"?

While not grammatically required, it's best practice to specify what you're referring to. For example, saying "for stronger access to information" is clearer than just saying ""for stronger access"".

What is the difference between "for stronger access" and "for easier access"?

"For stronger access" implies making the current access more robust or secure, while "for easier access" focuses on simplifying the process of gaining access, potentially reducing barriers or complexities.