for reasons of convenience

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for reasons of convenience" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to explain why something is done in a certain way for practical or practicality reasons. Example: "The company has decided to change the location of the meeting to the conference room for reasons of convenience. The room is larger and has better audio-visual equipment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

Those who use the internet for grocery shopping do it for reasons of convenience, certainly.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

They will sleep in separate beds but, for reasons of convenience, under the same roof.

The Economist

For reasons of convenience, it was administered as part of South West Africa from 1922 until 1977.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In any event, he added, the court is not entitled to ignore even an unwise constitutional command for reasons of convenience.

The New York Times

When Christopher Jefferies asks me to meet him at a London club, the Royal Over-Seas League in St James's, it is for reasons of convenience rather than privacy.

The Guardian

"People, especially women, go on singles tours primarily for reasons of convenience, safety and the level of comfort you get from being with other singles," said Ms. Vollan of Aim Higher.

The New York Times - Travel

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

16 human-written examples

Travelers, meanwhile, often resist these constraints, sometimes for reasons of personal convenience.

The New York Times

For reasons of speed, convenience and economy, it is often easier to write than to speak.

Independent

How could it be, when the deaths of 5,000 people in a single night, for reasons of administrative convenience, are dealt with in a single sentence?

The Guardian - Opinion

He and Patricia finally married, in the US for reasons of legal convenience, in 1967, three years after the birth of their son Mark, and a few days after the divorce had come through.

The Guardian - Music

Mr Kinnock's people say that Mr Smidt had already indicated a desire to leave the commission in 2003 or 2004 and that they brought forward his departure for reasons of administrative convenience.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for reasons of convenience", ensure it genuinely reflects the primary motivation. Overusing it can weaken your explanation.

Common error

Avoid using "for reasons of convenience" excessively in highly formal documents, as it can sometimes sound too casual. Opt for more specific or professional-sounding alternatives like "for efficiency's sake" or "due to logistical considerations".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for reasons of convenience" primarily functions as an adverbial phrase. It modifies a verb or clause by providing the cause or justification for an action. This is evident in the Ludwig examples, where the phrase explains the motivation behind various decisions or actions.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for reasons of convenience" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that something is done because it is the easiest or most practical option. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and provides numerous real-world examples. While versatile, it's important to consider the context. While appropriate for news articles and general communications, in highly formal or academic settings, it may be better to opt for more specific and professional alternatives. The expression is frequently found in scientific and news media sources, emphasizing its wide applicability. Remember that choosing your words carefully can make your writing clearer and more impactful.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

as a matter of practicality

Emphasizes the practical considerations influencing the decision.

due to practicality

Focuses more on the practical aspect rather than explicitly stating convenience.

for the sake of simplicity

Directly points to simplicity as the main driver for the action.

for ease of use

Highlights the simplicity and user-friendliness aspect of the choice.

out of expediency

Implies a decision made for quick and immediate advantage, similar to convenience.

for efficiency's sake

Highlights the goal of achieving greater efficiency.

to simplify matters

Focuses on the simplification aspect as the primary motivation.

to streamline the process

Focuses on making a process more efficient and less complicated.

for logistical reasons

Broader term encompassing the organizational and practical aspects.

on grounds of availability

Stresses the aspect of something being readily available.

FAQs

How can I use "for reasons of convenience" in a sentence?

Use "for reasons of convenience" to explain why a particular action or decision was made because it was the easiest or most practical option. For example, "The meeting was scheduled online "for reasons of convenience"."

What are some alternatives to "for reasons of convenience"?

You can use alternatives like "due to practicality", "out of expediency", or "for ease of use" depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "for reasons of convenience" in academic writing?

While grammatically correct, "for reasons of convenience" might be perceived as less formal. Consider using more specific and formal alternatives like "for efficiency's sake" or "due to logistical considerations" to maintain a professional tone.

What's the difference between "for reasons of convenience" and "for purposes of convenience"?

"For reasons of convenience" explains the motivation behind a decision, while "for purposes of convenience" indicates the intended outcome or goal. While they are often interchangeable, the first focuses on the 'why', and the second focuses on the 'what'.