Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
for prior interaction
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "for prior interaction" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a previous engagement or communication that has taken place before the current context. Example: "Thank you for your feedback; I appreciate your insights from our prior interaction."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(19)
for prior reporting
for proper reporting
for standardized reporting
for accurate reporting
to ensure accurate reporting
to facilitate correct reporting
for accurate and complete reporting
to enable reliable reporting
to maintain ethical reporting standards
for serious reporting
for real reporting
for effective reporting
for adequate reporting
for genuine reporting
for good reporting
for fair reporting
for corresponding reporting
for inappropriate reporting
for regular reporting
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
These effects were demonstrable in the absence of tissue and without the need for prior interaction with the lung.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
Of additional interest will be the connectivity between different domain-specific systems (e.g., capacity to understand others' mental states and abilities for numerical quantification in the context of cooperative games) and their links to more domain-general processes (e.g., memory for prior interactions and participants).
Science
Here, an open challenge for future is assigning quantitative confidence scores and statistical information for each prior interaction extracted from databases.
Science
More specifically, for both large real datasets (E. coli and B. subtilis), both methods perform better than various baselines (no PKIs), with up to 10 FPIs for each true prior interaction.
Science
The statistical comparison of the networks inferred with actual (i.e., reported in databases) and random prior models indicated that the inference algorithm rejected a significantly higher number of prior interactions when randomly generated priors were used for modeling.
Science
Using interactions as participants allows representation of sequential binding events and can indicate the requirement of a prior interaction for a subsequent interaction.
However, with incorporation of literature co-citation data and experimental co-expression data in different tissues will enable us to estimate the confidence scores and statistical parameters for potential prior interactions.
Science
We find that the strength of individuals' intention to contribute towards species conservation depends on how conservation programs are funded, which species are being targeted for conservation, individuals' knowledge of and prior interaction with these species, awareness of need, awareness of responsibility, altruism, environmental concern, and contextual forces.
Science
In my work as a venture capitalist, I find this roadshow to be the most crucial eye-opening experience for engineer-founders who have no prior interaction with Fortune 500 companies in a sales role.
News & Media
In the generalized form of the error model, the prize introduced by the priors is sampled from a probability model with a Gaussian distribution (Equation 3) for the strength (wijprior) of each prior interaction.
Science
The prior interaction probabilities are drawn from two truncated normal distributions, x ± ~ N ± where N+ is the probability distribution for true interactions and N- is the probability distribution for false interactions.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "for prior interaction", ensure the context clearly establishes what the previous engagement involved. Be specific to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "for prior interaction" without specifying the nature of the interaction. Instead of saying, "We adjusted the strategy for prior interaction", specify, "We adjusted the strategy based on data from our prior interaction with customer service" to give more context.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "for prior interaction" functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun or verb by providing context about a preceding engagement. Ludwig confirms this phrase is usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
20%
Formal & Business
20%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "for prior interaction" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to indicate that something is being done or considered in light of a previous engagement or communication. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is usable in written English. While not very common, it appears most frequently in scientific contexts. When using this phrase, it's important to provide sufficient context about the nature of the prior interaction to avoid vagueness. Related phrases include "regarding previous communication" and "concerning earlier discussions". Be mindful of your audience, and don't hesitate to select the words which are most adequate for your specific situation.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
regarding previous communication
Replaces 'interaction' with 'communication', focusing on the exchange of information.
concerning earlier discussions
Substitutes 'prior interaction' with 'earlier discussions', highlighting a conversational exchange.
based on past engagement
Uses 'past engagement' to represent the prior connection or involvement.
in light of former dealings
Employs 'former dealings' to indicate previous transactions or interactions.
considering preliminary contact
Replaces 'prior interaction' with 'preliminary contact', emphasizing the initial nature of the interaction.
with respect to preceding exchanges
Uses 'preceding exchanges' to convey the idea of interactions that occurred before.
given antecedent collaboration
Replaces "interaction" with "collaboration", focusing on an act of working jointly.
following an initial connection
Highlights the start of a relationship or exchange.
referring to preliminary encounters
Uses 'preliminary encounters' to suggest brief or initial interactions.
taking into account previous activity
Suggests considering past actions or engagement when making a decision or assessment.
FAQs
How can I use "for prior interaction" in a sentence?
You might say, "The model was adjusted to account "for prior interaction" with the environment" or "The algorithm leverages data "from prior interaction" to improve predictions.
What phrases are similar to "for prior interaction"?
Alternatives include "regarding previous communication", "concerning earlier discussions", or "based on past engagement". Each option emphasizes a different aspect of the prior exchange or relationship.
Is "for prior interaction" grammatically correct?
Yes, "for prior interaction" is grammatically sound and functions as a prepositional phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.
How formal is the phrase "for prior interaction"?
The level of formality is neutral. It is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, but be mindful of your audience and choose the most appropriate phrasing for your specific situation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested