Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
for possible inclusion
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'for possible inclusion' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are suggesting something that could be added or included. For example: "I'd like to suggest adding a part to the project plan for possible inclusion in the proposal."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Mr. Catizone said his association was reviewing 10 more pharmacies for possible inclusion.
News & Media
The passages had been sent by Heller to the Corbyn office a fortnight ago for possible inclusion in the speech.
News & Media
Yesterday, they were scheduled to tape an interview for possible inclusion with their video on the "Live Free or Die Hard" DVD.
News & Media
But Burke said that 40 other players had been identified for possible inclusion on the team, which is expected to be named before the end of the year.
News & Media
Send in your questions by 11am on Tuesday 27 November for possible inclusion, and be sure to clock on from 1-2pm to see Rampling's responses.
News & Media
Our literature search yielded 610 publications for possible inclusion.
Science
independently screened all titles yielded by the initial search strategy for possible inclusion.
After identifying appropriateness for possible inclusion, phase II consisted of two reviewers (L.W. and D.N).
Reference lists were cross-checked to identify further publications for possible inclusion.
Science
The multiple database searches revealed 586 papers for review for possible inclusion.
Search results were screened by title, abstracts and keywords for possible inclusion.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "for possible inclusion" when you want to convey that something is being considered but not guaranteed to be added. It indicates a preliminary assessment phase.
Common error
Avoid using "for possible inclusion" if the inclusion is already decided or highly likely. Instead, use phrases that reflect the certainty, such as "for inclusion" or "to be included".
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "for possible inclusion" functions as a prepositional phrase typically used to modify a noun or verb, indicating the purpose or reason behind an action. It expresses the intention to consider something for addition or incorporation without a guaranteed outcome. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples.
Frequent in
Science
52%
News & Media
30%
Formal & Business
18%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "for possible inclusion" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to indicate that something is being considered for addition or incorporation, but its final status is not yet determined. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically correct and very common across various contexts. Predominantly found in scientific and news media sources, it conveys consideration and potential, making it suitable for both formal and informal communication. Related phrases include "for consideration" and "for potential inclusion", offering similar nuances. When using this phrase, ensure that inclusion is genuinely under consideration and not a foregone conclusion, as overstating certainty is a common pitfall.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
for potential inclusion
Similar in meaning but uses "potential" instead of "possible", emphasizing the inherent capability rather than just a chance.
for possible addition
Focuses specifically on adding something, whereas "inclusion" can be broader.
for eventual integration
Specifies that inclusion might happen at a later stage.
for consideration
More general, implying review for any purpose, not necessarily inclusion.
under consideration
Similar to "for consideration" but emphasizes that the review is currently underway.
for future incorporation
Highlights the idea of adding something as a formal part of a whole, typically used in organizational contexts.
for evaluation
Highlights the assessment process before deciding on inclusion.
for review
Implies a formal examination to determine suitability.
to be considered
Passive voice, emphasizing the object being assessed.
as a prospective element
More formal, framing the item as a potential component.
FAQs
How can I use "for possible inclusion" in a sentence?
You can use "for possible inclusion" to indicate that something is being considered but is not yet certain to be included. For example, "These documents are being reviewed "for possible inclusion" in the report."
What are some alternatives to "for possible inclusion"?
Some alternatives include phrases like "for consideration", "for potential inclusion", or "to be considered", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "for possible inclusion"?
Yes, "for possible inclusion" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase to express that something is being evaluated for potential addition or integration.
When should I use "for inclusion" instead of "for possible inclusion"?
Use "for inclusion" when the decision to include something has already been made. "For possible inclusion" indicates that the decision is still pending after further review or evaluation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested