for joint use

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for joint use" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is intended to be used by multiple parties or individuals together. Example: "The conference room is available for joint use by all departments in the company."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

It has just announced that it will invest more than $90 million in facilities and equipment for joint use in military exercises.

The New York Times

To guide decisions informed by multiple health outcomes, we provide an online tool for joint use by patients with their physicians (http://brcatool.stanford.edu).edu

Stanford University

Ct. 349, 66 L. Ed. 671; for joint use of terminals; for routing; for interchange of traffic between railroads, and between a railroad and water carrier, section 402, pp. 476-478; section 405, p. 479; sections 412, 413, p. 483.

Cornell University

In this chapter, we describe techniques for joint use of SysML, the modeling language used for systems design, and MARTE (with UML) for designing the software elements of such systems.

Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded Systems with UML and MARTE Developing Cyber-Physical Systems

–Both sides will develop the highway up to Pyongyang and the railway onward to Sinuiju on the China border for joint use.

Forbes

state's requirements for joint use agreements.

Los Angeles Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

The experimental results have shown that the load carrying capacity of joints with vhss dowels is higher than for joints using hss dowels whilst still providing enough plastic deformation capacity to allow for ductile failure modes.

Engineering Structures

The district is looking into terminating its current contract with Arroyo Foundation and the Spartan Boosters that lasts through 2018, and entering into a similar contract with a new organization for joint-use of the field.

Los Angeles Times

In a December 2006 meeting, the City Council of the City of San Ramon approved the construction of a performing arts center and aquatics center for joint-use between the city and the SRVUSD.

Wikipedia

In light of the $270-million 270-million approved by Glendale voterschoolpril, City Council membond questioned whether the cost-shapprovedlocations for joint-use projects at local Glendale Unified schools — such as the new soccer field at Columbys and upGlendaleo tennis courts at Glendale High School — should be re-evotersed.

Los Angeles Times

It is worth mentioning that this study presents pioneering results for the joint use of SBAS and CW in concrete for use in construction.

Construction and Building Materials

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing shared resources or facilities, use "for joint use" to clearly indicate that the item is intended for multiple parties. Be specific about who the joint users are to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming "for joint use" automatically implies equal access or responsibility. Always clarify the terms of use, such as maintenance, scheduling, and usage limitations, to prevent misunderstandings among the users.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for joint use" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun or verb. It indicates the intended recipients or participants in the use of something, as confirmed by Ludwig. For example, "facilities for joint use" specifies the facilities are shared.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for joint use" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to indicate that a resource, facility, or agreement is intended to be shared by multiple parties. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across various contexts, primarily appearing in News & Media, Science, and Academic sources. While its frequency is uncommon, understanding its nuances and potential for ambiguity is crucial. Employing alternative phrases such as "for shared use" or "for collaborative use" may provide clarity depending on the specific context. Overall, "for joint use" serves as a useful tool for describing shared resources, but careful consideration of its scope and potential for misunderstanding is warranted.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for shared use

Focuses on the act of sharing something between multiple parties.

for collaborative use

Highlights the cooperative aspect of using something together.

for combined use

Emphasizes the action of uniting items or resources for a single purpose.

for common use

Indicates something is meant to be utilized by a general group or community.

for mutual use

Stresses the reciprocal benefit or arrangement in using something.

to be used jointly

A more verbose way of expressing the same idea, phrasing it as an action.

for shared application

Emphasizes the application or task being performed together.

for cooperative employment

Highlights the active collaboration and work aspect of the usage.

for collective utilization

Stresses the group aspect of using something, often in a formal setting.

to be employed together

A functional restatement of joint use that frames something as an active, synchronous effort.

FAQs

How can I use "for joint use" in a sentence?

You can use "for joint use" to describe facilities, equipment, or agreements shared by multiple parties. For example, "The community garden is available "for joint use" by all residents".

What's a simple substitute for "for joint use"?

A simpler substitute could be "for shared use". Both phrases indicate that something is intended to be used by more than one person or group.

Is it redundant to say 'for joint use together'?

Yes, saying "for joint use together" is redundant. The phrase "for joint use" already implies that it's being used together, so adding "together" is unnecessary.

When is it more appropriate to use "for collaborative use" instead of "for joint use"?

Use "for collaborative use" when you want to emphasize the aspect of people working together on a project or task, rather than simply sharing a resource.