for human labor

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for human labor" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing tasks, roles, or activities that are specifically intended to be performed by people rather than machines or automated systems. Example: "The factory has shifted its focus to tasks that require creativity and critical thinking, which are better suited for human labor."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

Digital labor, in short, substitutes for human labor.

The New York Times

The rise of increasingly powerful machines will inevitably reduce the demand for human labor, they say.

The New Yorker

Businesses insist that they are not using machines as a direct substitute for human labor, but plan instead to compete by improving their service over all.

The New York Times

"Its potential is far greater than simply substituting technology for human labor," said Erik Brynjolfsson, an economist at the M.I.T Sloan School of Management.

The New York Times - Science

Most of the vines are planted on narrow terraces, inaccessible to tractors; the need for human labor contributes to the high cost of Condrieu.

The New York Times - Food

In computer data centers, technology -- from start-ups like Opsware and big companies like I.B.M. and Hewlett-Packard -- is increasingly being substituted for human labor, much as that process has unfolded for decades on factory floors.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

Objective: The mechanism for the initiation of human labor remains unknown and is under extensive investigation.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

As in [2, 14], we use the extracted/reconstructed ridges of EHG bursts for the prediction of human labor.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Moreover, the production of plants with larger, more flavorful grains may require more water or nutrients to produce, may grow more slowly, and may become host to new insect pests, thereby necessitating a significant investment of human labor for their cultivation.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

This means that we should be seeing far more output for each hour of human labor.

Huffington Post

Experimental studies are also problematic in the setting of human labor for ethical reasons.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the allocation of tasks between humans and machines, use "for human labor" to specifically indicate tasks best suited to human capabilities like creativity, critical thinking, and complex problem-solving.

Common error

While "for human labor" is acceptable, avoid using it excessively in highly technical or scientific writing where more precise terms like "manual operation" or "skilled workforce" might be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for human labor" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun or verb. It specifies the intended agent or recipient of an action, indicating that something is designed or intended to be carried out by people. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for human labor" is a grammatically correct and usable expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves to specify tasks or activities intended for human execution, often contrasting with automation. While its frequency is uncommon, it appears across news, media, and scientific contexts. When using the phrase, ensure it aligns with tasks genuinely benefiting from human skills like critical thinking and creativity. Alternatives like "requiring human workforce" or "dependent on human skills" can offer a more formal tone. Its register remains generally neutral, suitable for a range of informative discussions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

requiring human workforce

Emphasizes the necessity of a human workforce for a particular task.

utilizing human employees

Highlights the act of using human employees.

needing manual tasks

Focuses on the manual aspect of the work.

dependent on human skills

Stresses the reliance on skills possessed by humans.

entailing human effort

Emphasizes the exertion of effort by humans.

involving human participation

Highlights the involvement of humans in the work.

demand for human expertise

Focuses on the need for specialized knowledge from humans.

with human intervention

Highlights the need for humans to step in and take action.

requiring manpower

Emphasizes the necessity of a human manpower.

needing human resources

Focuses on the requirement of human resources for a particular task.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "for human labor" to sound more formal?

Consider using phrases such as "requiring manual operation", "dependent on skilled workforce", or "entailing human capital" for a more formal tone.

When is it appropriate to use "for human labor" instead of "for automation"?

"For human labor" is suitable when discussing tasks requiring human skills, judgment, or creativity, whereas "for automation" applies to tasks designed for machines or algorithms.

Is there a difference between "manual labor" and "for human labor"?

"Manual labor" typically refers to physical work, whereas "for human labor" is a broader term encompassing tasks requiring cognitive and creative skills in addition to physical effort. You can also explore alternatives such as "human workforce" or "human employees".

What are some common misuses of the phrase "for human labor"?

A common error is using "for human labor" in contexts where automation is clearly more efficient or appropriate. Ensure the task genuinely benefits from human skills before using this phrase.