for full time

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for full time" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a job or commitment that requires a person to work the standard number of hours, typically 40 hours a week. Example: "She is looking for a position that offers benefits and is for full time."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

Referee blows his whistle for full time.

The New York Times

The referee blows for full time.

The New York Times

I spent spare days looking for full time jobs.

The Guardian - Business

staff wear blue badges — dark blue for full time and light for temps.

The New Yorker

These aren't meant for full time, real-life musicians.

TechCrunch

The referee sometimes blows for full time before 90 minutes are up.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

Fees Currently £3,070 for full-time undergraduate courses.

The Guardian

Fees £3,145 for full-time undergraduates.

The Guardian

£13,240 for full-time international undergraduates.

The Guardian

But for full-time mothers or fathers it can be.

The Guardian

120+2 mins: The ref blows for full-time.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing job opportunities, ensure clarity by specifying the working hours and responsibilities associated with a position "for full time".

Common error

Avoid using "for full time" when the adjective "full-time" is more appropriate to describe a noun. For example, use "full-time employee" instead of "employee for full time".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for full time" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a verb or noun. It specifies the duration or commitment level associated with an activity, job, or service, indicating it requires a standard number of hours.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Science

34%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for full time" is a grammatically sound and commonly used prepositional phrase indicating a standard duration of commitment, often in the context of employment. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While alternatives like "full-time" or "on a full-time basis" exist, "for full time" remains a versatile and readily understood expression across various domains. Be mindful of its adjectival use, where "full-time" might be more appropriate. The phrase appears frequently in News & Media, Wiki, and Scientific domains, solidifying its widespread applicability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

on a full-time basis

Replaces the preposition "for" with "on" and adds "basis" to create a more formal tone.

in a full-time capacity

Substitutes "time" with "capacity" to focus on the role or function being performed.

for the entire duration

Emphasizes the complete length of the period involved.

for the complete period

Highlights the completeness of the specified time.

throughout the full time

Uses "throughout" to stress continuous action during the specified time.

during the full time

Uses "during" to specify an action happening within the entire time.

for all the hours

Directly references the total working hours involved.

covering the full time

Focuses on the act of spanning the entirety of the time.

across the full timeframe

Emphasizes the period or scope that the action or employment spans.

spanning the full term

Highlights the full extent of the designated duration.

FAQs

How can I use "for full time" in a sentence?

The phrase "for full time" is often used to describe the duration or extent of something, like a job or service. For example: "She is looking "for full time" employment."

What are some alternatives to "for full time"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "on a full-time basis" or "in a full-time capacity". These alternatives may offer a slightly more formal tone.

Is it correct to say "for full-time" instead of "for full time"?

While "for full time" is grammatically correct, "full-time" typically functions as an adjective. So, you might say "She is applying "for full-time" positions", using "full-time" as a compound adjective. Alternatively, "She is seeking a position "for full time"", describing the duration.

What is the difference between "for full time" and "as a full-time"?

"For full time" generally describes the duration or commitment level, while "as a full-time" specifies a role or capacity. For example, "She is working "for full time"" indicates the hours she's dedicating, whereas "She is employed "as a full-time" teacher" specifies her job title.