for full evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for full evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the need for complete or comprehensive proof or documentation in a particular context. Example: "The researcher provided several documents for full evidence of the claims made in the study."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Just before the last round of talks began, Secretary of State John Kerry seemed open to meeting Iran halfway and easing some restrictions on the nation almost as soon as the deal was a go, rather than waiting for full evidence of implementation from nuclear watchdogs.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

But he'll keep fighting the good fight, promising to confound the creationists by setting out the full evidence for evolution in his next book.

The Guardian - Books

However, from a regulatory perspective the FDA would need to see full evidence for the developmental history and measurement properties of the revised instrument, assuming it is the revised version that is currently available for use in clinical trials.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Moreover, although the full evidence for a mitochondrial sequence to be functional and not present in the nucleus (numts) can be reached only by sequencing mRNAs (cDNAs) from the individuals [ 36], in our case a variety of evidence makes us think that the diverse sequences found within single planarians are not numts.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

We thus combined the data in a full evidence approach for all further analyses.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Note that interaction estimates obtained were influenced by the full evidence base for which study mean covariate(s) values were available, including trials considering ad hoc treatments.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Table 1 briefly outlines some key epidemiological evidence for the health associations of each wish-listed factor (from meta-analyses where available), although the full evidence review for each factor was more comprehensive than can be reported here.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

As recently raised by Doshi et al 8 as well as by the AllTrials campaign (http://www.alltrials.net), the complete and unbiased reporting of findings from past trials is equally important for securing access to the full evidence.

BMJ Open

In the IIIDB, users can differentiate access high-confidence and low-confidence predictions of human IIIs (see detailed description in Result section), and then see the full evidence values for each predicted III. Figure 1 shows the IIIDB web interface screen-shots of the III search and isoform module search function in the IIIDB.

BMC Genomics

Full evidence was given of the composer's humanity and passion for music, and given again, differently, in the performances.

The New York Times - Arts

His brilliant talents for pastiche and gaudy and garrulous characters, at times bordering on cruelty, are in full evidence here.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When requesting information, specify "for full evidence" to ensure that all supporting documents and data are provided, leaving no room for ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "full" when "complete" or "comprehensive" better conveys the intended meaning of thoroughness and leaving nothing out. Using "for complete evidence" or "for comprehensive evidence" emphasizes that all aspects of the evidence are considered.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for full evidence" functions as a prepositional phrase, often used to express the reason or purpose behind a request or action. It clarifies the need for comprehensive documentation or proof.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

38%

News & Media

59%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for full evidence" is a prepositional phrase used to emphasize the necessity of complete and thorough proof or documentation. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, although it's relatively rare. It finds its use in a range of contexts from news and media to scientific writing. While grammatically correct, alternative phrases like "for complete evidence" or "for comprehensive evidence" might be more common and could convey your intended meaning more clearly. Remember to use "for full evidence" when you want to ensure that all supporting documents and data are provided, leaving no room for ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for complete evidence

Replaces "full" with "complete", emphasizing thoroughness.

for comprehensive evidence

Substitutes "full" with "comprehensive", highlighting the breadth of the evidence.

for exhaustive evidence

Uses "exhaustive" instead of "full", indicating a very thorough search for evidence.

for thorough evidence

Replaces "full" with "thorough", focusing on the meticulous nature of the evidence.

for conclusive evidence

Emphasizes that the evidence leads to a definite conclusion.

to provide complete proof

Shifts the focus to the act of providing proof, using "complete" to describe the proof.

to furnish full proof

Uses "furnish" instead of "provide" and replaces "evidence" with "proof".

in support of the full evidence

Indicates support of the complete set of evidence.

for the entire evidence

Replaces 'full' with 'entire', implying all-inclusiveness.

with all the evidence available

Highlights the availability of all evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "for full evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "for full evidence" to request comprehensive supporting documents or data, as in, "The committee requested the report "for full evidence" of the project's success".

What's a good alternative to "for full evidence"?

Alternatives include "for complete evidence", "for comprehensive evidence", or "for exhaustive evidence", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "for full evidence"?

It's appropriate when you need comprehensive proof or documentation and want to ensure nothing is omitted. This is particularly relevant in legal, scientific, or investigative contexts.

Is "full evidence" the same as "complete evidence"?

While similar, "complete evidence" emphasizes that nothing is missing, while "full evidence" suggests that all available evidence is presented. The difference is subtle but can be significant depending on the context.