for fair comparison

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'for fair comparison' is correct and usable in written English.
It is often used to indicate that two or more things are being compared in an unbiased manner. For example, "We need to take into account the different variables between the two experiments in order to make a for fair comparison."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

For fair comparison, we applied the same feature extraction procedure as discussed in previous work, obtained 1051 samples with 1840-dimensional pattributesutes and 3000 link attributes.

Columbia University

For fair comparison, we set the same initial starting states and initial weight parameters for both approaches under the same simulation environment.

Neurocomputing

The unified approach is focused on the substantive issues relating to respondents' privacy and statistical efficiency and is helpful for fair comparison of various procedures.

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

For fair comparison, the same dataset was used in comparison.

Brain Informatics

For fair comparison, we relax the interference constraint for the time being.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

For fair comparison, the data in TMR should be divided as well.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

For fair comparison, the Newton's method is plotted here with a constant step size of 1.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

For fair comparison, the sizes of the lexicons are kept the same at 35 K units.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

For fair comparison, we employ three commonly used criteria to evaluate the proposed GMVP.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

This is for fair comparison among systems with different M values.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

For fair comparison, the RMSE is calculated when the sound source number estimation is correct.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for fair comparison", ensure that all variables and conditions are clearly defined and controlled to avoid any potential bias in the results.

Common error

Avoid using "for fair comparison" without first accounting for all relevant contextual differences between the subjects being compared, as this can lead to misleading conclusions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for fair comparison" typically functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause to indicate the purpose or condition under which a comparison is being made. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

Academia

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for fair comparison" serves as a crucial indicator of objectivity in analyses, particularly within scientific and academic fields. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. Predominantly found in formal and scientific registers, its purpose is to ensure transparency and credibility by signaling an unbiased evaluation. To maintain this integrity, it's essential to control variables, define conditions, and acknowledge limitations. While alternatives like "for unbiased comparison" or "for equitable comparison" exist, the core intention remains: to promote impartiality. Remembering to account for contextual differences prevents potentially misleading conclusions, reinforcing the phrase's value in rigorous, objective assessments.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for unbiased comparison

Emphasizes the removal of prejudice or favoritism in the comparative process.

for equitable comparison

Highlights the fairness and justice aspects of the comparison, ensuring equal treatment.

to ensure a level playing field

Implies creating equal opportunities and conditions to allow for just comparison.

for objective assessment

Focuses on eliminating subjective influences from the evaluation.

for standardized evaluation

Stresses the importance of applying consistent standards across all subjects being compared.

to make a balanced comparison

Suggests weighing all factors appropriately to avoid skewed results.

to allow a just comparison

Similar to 'equitable', it ensures the moral and ethical correctness of the comparison.

for a valid comparison

Focuses on the comparison being logically sound and based on relevant criteria.

to provide an equal basis for comparison

Ensures that the foundation upon which the comparison is made is uniform.

for apples-to-apples comparison

Indicates comparing like items to ensure the comparison is meaningful and accurate.

FAQs

How can I ensure a comparison is actually fair?

To ensure a comparison is fair, control for extraneous variables, use standardized metrics, and acknowledge limitations. Transparency is key to justify the use of "for fair comparison".

What does "for fair comparison" actually mean?

The phrase "for fair comparison" means that an attempt has been made to equate the variables being examined so the evaluation is as objective as possible. It indicates efforts to minimize bias.

Which is a better phrase: "for fair comparison" or "for accurate comparison"?

The choice between "for fair comparison" and "for accurate comparison" depends on the specific context. "For fair comparison" emphasizes impartiality, while "for accurate comparison" highlights the correctness and precision of the assessment.

What's an alternative to "for fair comparison"?

Alternatives include "for unbiased comparison", "for equitable comparison", or to ensure a "level playing field", depending on the nuance you want to convey.