for evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for evidence" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used any time you need to cite something in order to prove the accuracy of your information. For example, "The suspect was taken into custody for theft and police provided video footage for evidence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

For evidence?

The New Yorker

"But lobbying for evidence.

The Guardian

A hunger for evidence.

Harvard University

"Two, he continued to look for evidence.

The New York Times

For evidence, consider the column's eponym.

The Economist

The police took it for evidence.

The New York Times

"We simply looked for evidence".

The Guardian

Museums are repositories for evidence.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

This hardly constitutes a "disrespect for evidence".

The New York Times

Investigators began searching it for evidence.

The New York Times

Look at the Tyrie report for evidence".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "for evidence" to introduce facts, data, or examples that support a claim or argument. It helps to strengthen your position and convince your audience of the validity of your statements.

Common error

Avoid starting multiple sentences or paragraphs with "for evidence". While it's a useful phrase, overusing it can make your writing sound repetitive and monotonous. Instead, try varying your sentence structure with alternative phrases or transitions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for evidence" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase that serves as an adjunct, modifying a clause by providing a reason or justification. As seen in Ludwig's examples, it introduces supporting information or facts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for evidence" is a commonly used and grammatically correct way to introduce supporting information for a claim. According to Ludwig, it functions as a prepositional phrase that provides substantiation or justification. Its neutral register makes it suitable for a wide range of contexts, from news reports to academic papers. To ensure clarity and avoid repetition, consider using alternatives such as "as proof" or "to demonstrate". Remember, the most effective use of "for evidence" is when it directly supports and clarifies your point, making your argument more persuasive.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

as proof

This alternative directly suggests the purpose of demonstrating truth or validity.

to demonstrate

Changes the phrase to an infinitive verb, focusing on the action of showing something clearly.

by way of illustration

Introduces an example or specific instance to clarify or support a point.

in support of this

This phrase is more direct in stating that what follows backs up a previous claim.

to substantiate

Emphasizes the act of providing evidence to confirm the truth of something.

for verification

Suggests the intention to check or confirm the accuracy of information.

as evidence suggests

Indicates that the evidence is not definitive but points toward a particular conclusion.

to give credence to

This is more formal and implies lending believability or trustworthiness.

in confirmation

Used to show that something is true or has been proven.

to corroborate

Highlights the act of strengthening or supporting a statement with additional evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "for evidence" in a sentence?

The phrase "for evidence" is typically used to introduce information or examples that support a claim. For example, "The company's profits have increased significantly; "for evidence", look at the quarterly reports."

What are some alternatives to saying "for evidence"?

You can use alternatives such as "as proof", "to demonstrate", or "by way of illustration" depending on the context.

Is it correct to use "as evidence" instead of "for evidence"?

While "for evidence" is used to introduce supporting facts, "as evidence" typically describes something that serves as proof. Consider the nuance to choose the more fitting phrase. For instance, "The document serves as evidence".

What's the difference between "for example" and "for evidence"?

"For example" introduces a specific instance that illustrates a general point, while "for evidence" presents data, facts, or observations that substantiate a claim. "For example", "Many animals hibernate, for example, bears" differs from "Climate change is occurring; "for evidence", see rising sea levels".