for either claim

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for either claim" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing options or conditions related to two different claims or assertions. Example: "The evidence presented is sufficient for either claim to be substantiated in court."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

There is no evidence for either claim.

The Guardian - Books

Both claims may be partially true (70), an ambiguity that ultimately renders the test nonspecific for either claim.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

In the study, 320 undergraduate students were assigned a news item presenting either claims both for and against a vaccine/autism link (false balance), a purely anti-vax "vaccines-definitely-cause-autism" article and a "there is no link" article.

The Guardian - Opinion

During the postindex period (follow-up), patients were considered to initiate OP treatment if they had a claim for either a BIS or a non-BIS within 12 months after the index date.

Clinical interventions in aging

It is commonplace today for schools either to claim a "need blind" admissions policy or to aspire to one.

The New York Times

Cycles with pharmacy claims for either were not included, as the precise date for the administration of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim could not be determined.

BMC Cancer

The bombing was the second in two weeks in the fortified capital, though no one has claimed responsibility for either.

The New York Times

Many people, for example, reject either the claim that equality is a communal good or that it is valuable at all.

SEP

In the past, Republicans would justify tax cuts for the rich either by claiming that they would pay for themselves or by claiming that they could make up for lost revenue by cutting wasteful spending.

The New York Times

The vaccine does not need to be kept refrigerated for storage or distribution either, they claim, and it does away with the danger of an anaphylactic shock in people who are allergic to ovalbumin, a protein in chicken eggs that is often present in the shots in very low amounts.

Science Magazine

The White House has failed to offer any substantiation for that claim either.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for either claim", ensure the context clearly presents two distinct claims being considered. This avoids ambiguity and ensures the reader understands the comparative nature of your statement.

Common error

A common mistake is to use "for either claim" when more than two claims are being discussed. Ensure the phrase accurately reflects that you are considering precisely two specific claims, not a broader set.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for either claim" functions as a prepositional phrase that typically modifies a verb or noun, indicating a condition, reason, or lack thereof pertaining to two distinct assertions. As Ludwig AI reports, the phrase is usable in written English, specifically pointing out options related to two different claims.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for either claim" is grammatically correct and functions as a prepositional phrase used to specify conditions or evaluations concerning two distinct claims. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. Its usage is relatively uncommon but appears in both news and scientific contexts, maintaining a neutral register. The phrase serves to express consideration or applicability to one or both of two specific assertions, and it's crucial to ensure that only two claims are indeed under consideration to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases offer alternative ways to express this relationship, such as "regarding both assertions" or "concerning either statement". Overall, while not exceedingly frequent, "for either claim" is a precise and valuable expression when discussing the validity or relevance of two distinct assertions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for both claims

Shifts the focus from choosing one to addressing both claims simultaneously.

for neither claim

Expresses the opposite - absence of evidence or support

concerning either statement

Replaces claim with statement, altering the formality slightly.

regarding both assertions

Emphasizes considering both claims, shifting from choice to encompassing both.

in respect to either argument

Substitutes claim with argument, implying a more formal debate or discussion.

for any claim

Broadens the scope to include all potential claims, not just two specific ones.

with regard to both contentions

Uses 'contentions' to suggest a disputed claim, increasing formality.

regarding all claims

Expands the scope to include claims in general, losing the specificity to two particular claims.

pertaining to either allegation

Replaces claim with allegation, implying a potentially unsubstantiated assertion.

relating to both declarations

Utilizes "declarations", changing the context to a formal announcement or statement.

FAQs

How do you use "for either claim" in a sentence?

Use "for either claim" to indicate that a condition, evidence, or argument applies to one of two specific claims. For example, "There is no evidence "for either claim"."

What is an alternative to saying "for either claim"?

Alternatives include "regarding both assertions", "concerning either statement", or "in respect to either argument", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "for either claim" or "for both claims"?

The choice depends on whether you're addressing one of two claims individually ("for either claim") or addressing both claims together ("for both claims").

What does "no evidence for either claim" mean?

It means that there is a lack of supporting evidence to support "either claim" being made. This suggests that both claims are unsubstantiated.