for comparison

USAGE SUMMARY

"for comparison" is a valid phrase and can be used in written English.
Here is an example: "We can compare the results of this experiment to those of the last, for comparison."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

For comparison, consider Pacquiao.

The New York Times - Sports

(See Puma for comparison) Puma: Headache.

The Economist

They also tested artificial sweeteners for comparison.

The New York Times - Health

I threw that in, just for comparison.

The New York Times

For comparison, he began centrifuging normal cells.

Encyclopedia Britannica

I held the swatch up for comparison.

The New Yorker

(For comparison, a pound coin weighs 9.5g).

The Guardian - Tech

There were two piquant opportunities for comparison.

The New York Times - Arts

Which hospitals would be chosen for comparison?

The New York Times - Health

Glastonbury offers many opportunities for comparison.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

A single device is shown for comparison.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "for comparison" to clearly signal to your reader that you are about to draw a parallel or contrast between two or more things. This helps improve clarity and understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "for comparison" when the elements being compared lack a clear and relevant connection. Ensure that the comparison serves a purpose and enhances understanding, rather than introducing unrelated details that confuse the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for comparison" functions as a transitional phrase, specifically a purpose connector. It signals that the subsequent information is presented to facilitate a comparison between two or more items. According to Ludwig, this phrase effectively guides the reader to understand the relationship between the elements being discussed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for comparison" is a versatile and frequently used transitional phrase that serves to introduce comparative information. As affirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically sound and widely accepted. Its prevalence across diverse contexts, including news, science, and academia, underscores its utility in facilitating understanding through comparison. When employing this phrase, ensure relevance and clarity in the information being compared to maximize its effectiveness. Alternatives such as "by comparison" or "in contrast" can be used to fine-tune the emphasis on similarity or difference.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

by comparison

A shorter version of the original phrase, maintaining a high degree of similarity.

when compared with

Explicitly frames the comparison process.

in contrast

Directly highlights a difference between two or more things.

as opposed to

Highlights direct opposition or contrast.

by way of contrast

Emphasizes differences more strongly than similarities.

as a point of reference

Implies using something familiar to understand something new.

to draw a parallel

Focuses on identifying similarities between distinct entities.

in relation to

Positions something within a context of other related items.

similarly

Indicates a resemblance or likeness between two things.

in the same vein

Suggests a similar style, manner, or approach.

FAQs

How can I use "for comparison" in a sentence?

You can use "for comparison" to introduce data or examples that highlight similarities or differences between two or more subjects. For instance, "The car's fuel efficiency is 30 MPG; "for comparison", the truck only gets 15 MPG".

What phrases are similar in meaning to "for comparison"?

Alternatives to "for comparison" include "by comparison", "in contrast", or "as a point of reference", each subtly altering the emphasis on similarity or difference.

Is it always necessary to use "for comparison" when presenting comparative data?

No, it's not always necessary. The need for "for comparison" depends on the context and the clarity of your writing. If the comparison is already evident, using the phrase might be redundant. However, it helps highlight the intention when it's not obvious.

What is the difference between "for comparison" and "in contrast"?

"For comparison" is a broader term that introduces both similarities and differences, while "in contrast" specifically signals a difference or opposition. Choose the phrase that best reflects the nature of the relationship you're highlighting.