for both trials

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for both trials" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to two separate trials or experiments in a scientific or analytical context. Example: "The results were consistent for both trials, indicating a reliable outcome."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

For both trials, copper levels in nanoCu and CuSO4 groups were supplemented at a ratio of 50 mg/kg.

Livestock Science

For both trials, workers under the experimental condition reported significantly less severe symptoms than workers under control conditions.

Applied Ergonomics

For both trials, the metal concentrations in soil extracts cannot be related to the Zn concentration in the fertilizer or the rate of application.

Science of The Total Environment

For both trials the target numbers of patients in each treatment group are achieved, giving this study sufficient power to lead to promising results.

Maturitas

Importantly, the escape box is placed in the same location for both trials that occur on each individual training day, but is placed in a new location at the beginning of the first trial for each subsequent training day.

Nature

There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the two sampling methods and there was also positive correlation between the cis- and trans- β -carotene contents for both trials 1 and 2. This study provides information on β-carotene distribution and the appropriateness of SPM2 as an alternative and easy sampling method for carotenoid contents in yellow-fleshed cassava varieties.

LWT - Food Science and Technology

For both trials, nine diets with varying levels of fish meal (FM), fish oil (FO) and cornstarch (CS), and fixed levels of wheat meal and vitamin mineral premix (12%), were formulated according to d-optimality criteria assuming a quadratic response surface.

Aquaculture

In each trial, comparisons were made between intensive and moderate arms for both trials' primary end points and death/myocardial infarction.

Duke University

Four of the six speakers had exactly the same variant combinations for both trials ([G]/[L]/[D], [L]/[D], and [G]/[L]).

Lingua Sinica

Significant treatment differences were detected at Kwambonambi (p = 0.038) for BA removed at the first thinning, but not for Dargle (p = 0.204), with no significance detected at the second thinning for both trials (Kwambonambi: p = 0.767; Dargle: p = 0.383).

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Contrasting results were obtained for both trials in terms of the BA removed, however any establishment practices that suppress trees and/or reduce stocking, may potentially reduce the BA removed, especially during the first thinning operation.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for both trials", ensure that the context clearly establishes that only two trials are being referred to. If more than two trials are involved, consider using "for all trials" or specifying the trials by name or number.

Common error

Avoid using "for both trials" when your study involves more than two trials. This can create ambiguity. Instead, use more inclusive language like "across all trials" or specify the trials individually.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both trials" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase. According to Ludwig AI it's correct, and is used to specify the scope or context to which a statement or finding applies. This indicates that whatever is being discussed is relevant or applicable to each of the two trials being referenced.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for both trials" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, as verified by Ludwig AI, that is mainly employed in scientific and academic writing. Its purpose is to specify that a certain condition or result applies consistently across two different trials, thereby reinforcing the reliability of the findings. While the phrase is primarily found in scientific literature, it's essential to use it correctly, especially when more than two trials are involved, and to be mindful of potential misuse in broader contexts. Alternatives like "across both trials" or "in both trials" can offer subtle variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

across both trials

This alternative replaces "for" with "across", focusing on the trials as a collective scope.

in both trials

This alternative uses "in" instead of "for", maintaining a similar meaning but with a slightly different prepositional emphasis.

during both trials

This alternative emphasizes the temporal aspect, suggesting something occurred during the course of the trials.

throughout both trials

Similar to "during both trials", this option highlights that something was consistent or present from the start to the end of the experiments.

in each of the two trials

This alternative provides a more formal and explicit restatement of the concept.

for the two trials

This alternative uses an article before the noun "trials", making the reference more specific.

with both trials

This option emphasizes a relationship or connection between something and the trials.

regarding both trials

This alternative shifts the focus to discuss something specifically related to both trials.

concerning both trials

Similar to "regarding both trials", this option sets the topic or subject matter as the two trials.

in relation to both trials

This is a more verbose alternative emphasizing the connection or comparison being made to the trials.

FAQs

How can I use "for both trials" in a sentence?

You can use "for both trials" to indicate that a particular condition, result, or procedure applies to two specific trials. For example, "The same protocol was followed "for both trials"."

What are some alternatives to using "for both trials"?

Alternatives include phrases like "across both trials", "in both trials", or "during both trials", depending on the specific context and emphasis you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "for both trial" instead of "for both trials"?

No, it is not correct. Because the phrase indicates that a particular condition, result, or procedure applies to two trials. You need to use the plural form, "trials".

What's the difference between "for both trials" and "in both trials"?

"For both trials" emphasizes the application or relevance to the trials, while "in both trials" often refers to something occurring or being present within the context of the trials. The difference is subtle and often context-dependent.