for both shareholders

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for both shareholders" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing matters or decisions that affect two shareholders in a company or organization. Example: "The new policy was designed to create benefits for both shareholders, ensuring a fair distribution of profits."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

These measures are unpopular, but there's scope for plenty more, and therefore more suffering ahead for both shareholders and policyholders.

The Economist

There have been too many failed deals for both shareholders and the buyers over the last three years to make the market excited about mergers.

The New York Times

It is time for both shareholders and taxpayers to assess the value of such conveniences for the well-to-do.Frank Ketcham Sausalito, California.

The Economist

As with any kind of new business, the odds of establishing a new business that creates value for both shareholders and the public can be improved with good planning.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Using hand-collected data from 13D filings, I find that these contracts can specify rights and duties for both shareholders and managers, including director and management appointments, private information access, accounting procedures, dividends, capital structure, strategy, strategic alliances, private placements, and trading restrictions.

Harvard University

This underperformance has been disappointing for both shareholders as well as eBay's employees, who rely on share-based compensation as a meaningful component of their remuneration.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Had they invested more heavily in U.S. securities, for example, both shareholders and policyholders would have been much better off.

Forbes

"Valeant's offer to combine with Allergan will create substantial value for both companies' shareholders, and we look forward to giving Allergan shareholders the opportunity to speak for themselves regarding their support for this transaction".

Los Angeles Times

It represents a compelling opportunity to create significant value for both companies' shareholders," he said.

The Guardian - Business

There are also potential tax implications for both individual shareholders and the co-op corporation.

The New York Times

We look forward to your response and to working together toward a successful and mutually beneficial transaction for both companies' shareholders.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing corporate strategy or decisions, use "for both shareholders" to clearly indicate that the benefits or impacts apply to all shareholders, not just a select few. This promotes transparency and trust.

Common error

Avoid assuming that a strategy or decision is automatically "for both shareholders" without thoroughly analyzing its potential impacts. Ensure that the benefits are actually realized and fairly distributed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both shareholders" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb or noun, indicating the beneficiaries of an action or decision. Ludwig AI validates the correct usage in various contexts, showcasing its role in specifying who benefits from a given situation.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

20%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for both shareholders" is a common and grammatically correct way to emphasize that an action or decision benefits or impacts all shareholders. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's frequently used in news, business, and academic contexts to ensure clarity and transparency. When using this phrase, ensure that the intended benefits are realized and fairly distributed, avoiding overgeneralizations. Alternatives like "benefiting both shareholders" or "in the interest of both shareholders" can provide similar emphasis while adjusting the tone. Remember that "for both shareholders" typically implies there are only two shareholders. For larger groups, "for all shareholders" is appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

benefiting both shareholders

Focuses on the action of benefiting, emphasizing the positive outcome for shareholders.

in the interest of both shareholders

Highlights that an action is taken to serve the best interests of shareholders.

for the benefit of both shareholders

Similar to "in the interest of", stressing the advantageous nature for the shareholders.

mutually beneficial to shareholders

Emphasizes the reciprocal benefits derived by the shareholders.

to the advantage of both shareholders

Highlights the favorable outcome for shareholders.

serving both shareholders

Focuses on the act of serving the needs or interests of the shareholders.

equally for shareholders

Suggests impartiality and fairness in the distribution of benefits among shareholders.

with shareholders in mind

Indicates a focus on shareholder interests during decision-making processes.

considering shareholders interests

Implies a deliberate consideration of the impact on shareholders.

for shareholders collectively

Highlights the impact on all the members of the shareholder group

FAQs

How can I use "for both shareholders" in a sentence?

You can use "for both shareholders" to emphasize that an action or decision benefits all shareholders, such as, "The merger is expected to create significant value "for both shareholders"."

What is a synonym for "for both shareholders"?

Alternatives include phrases like "benefiting both shareholders", "in the interest of both shareholders", or "mutually beneficial to shareholders", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "for shareholders both" instead of "for both shareholders"?

While "for shareholders both" might be grammatically understandable, "for both shareholders" is the more idiomatic and commonly accepted phrasing.

What's the difference between saying "for both shareholders" and "for all shareholders"?

"For both shareholders" typically implies there are only two shareholders. "For all shareholders" is used when referring to a larger, unspecified group. The phrases are not interchangeable, depending on the context.