for both parties

USAGE SUMMARY

"for both parties" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when you wish to indicate that the action or opinion mentioned applies to two parties, such as in the sentence, "We agree that this plan of action is beneficial for both parties."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That goes for both parties.

The New Yorker

The report provided grist for both parties.

The New York Times

The arrangement worked well for both parties.

The New York Times

But there are risks for both parties.

The Economist

The rhetoric works well for both parties.

The Economist

That created a quandary for both parties.

The New York Times

This is beneficial for both parties.

Yale University

3.5 Knowledge Enhancement for Both Parties.

Stanford University

Because they're the same for both parties.

Yale University

They're the same for both parties.

Yale University

There are risks for both parties.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "for both parties", ensure that the context clearly defines who the two parties are. Ambiguity can lead to confusion.

Common error

Avoid using "for both parties" when the situation primarily benefits only one side. The phrase implies a balanced benefit or impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both parties" functions as a prepositional phrase that often acts as an adverbial modifier. It indicates that an action, situation, or agreement applies equally or has consequences for two specified entities. Ludwig's examples illustrate this across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Science

3%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for both parties" is a prepositional phrase indicating mutuality and shared impact between two defined entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and versatile across contexts from news and media to academia. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in defining the "parties" and that the situation genuinely reflects a balanced benefit or effect. Alternatives such as "mutually beneficial" or "in the interest of all parties" may be appropriate depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

mutually beneficial

This adjective describes something advantageous to each party involved, emphasizing the positive outcome.

reciprocal for all

This phrase indicates an exchange or action where both parties give and receive something in return.

in the interest of all parties

This phrase emphasizes actions taken to benefit all involved entities, focusing on shared goals.

a two-way street

Describes something involving give and take from both sides.

to the advantage of everyone

Highlights benefits accruing to each party emphasizing a positive outcome for all.

cross-party agreement

Implies an agreement that has the support of multiple political parties.

affecting all sides

Focuses on an impact experienced by each party involved, without explicitly indicating positive or negative outcome.

with shared consequences

Emphasizes common ramifications, whether positive or negative, influencing each party equally.

applicable to each side

Highlights relevance and applicability without specifying consequence.

jointly impacting

Focuses on the action having combined, unified affect on each involved party.

FAQs

How can I use "for both parties" in a sentence?

Use "for both parties" to indicate that something applies to or benefits two specific groups or individuals involved in a situation. For example, "The agreement was beneficial "for both parties"."

What is an alternative to saying "for both parties"?

Alternatives include "mutually beneficial", "in the interest of all parties", or "affecting all sides", depending on the specific context.

Is it redundant to say "for both of the parties" instead of "for both parties"?

Yes, "for both of the parties" is usually redundant. "For both parties" is concise and generally preferred unless there's a specific reason to emphasize 'of the parties'.

When is it appropriate to use "for all parties" instead of "for both parties"?

"For all parties" is appropriate when there are more than two groups or individuals involved. If only two are involved, ""for both parties"" is more precise.