for both laws

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for both laws" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to two specific laws in a context where you are discussing their application, implications, or requirements. Example: "The new regulations apply for both laws, ensuring compliance across the board."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

For the benefit of both law and humor, let's hope courts keep up the good work.

The New Yorker

My efforts to ensure the use of body cameras by law enforcement was to increase transparency and accountability for both law enforcement and the public and, of course, to promote safer communities.

The Guardian - Opinion

In other words, if things go wrong there will be tighter regulations making life more difficult for both law enforcement and biohackers.Most DIYbio leaders welcome all this (although some joke that DIYbio would not be where it is today without the FBI's support).

The Economist

Through-the-wall imaging (TWI) is a difficult but important task for both law enforcement and military missions.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

"We have clear principles which guide the response across our entire company to government demands for customer information for both law enforcement and national security issues," it said.

BBC

Yet, it has been difficult for both law schools and their critics to go much beyond recognizing the need for change, and succeed in spelling out realistic paths to new attitudes and new ways of providing value.

Huffington Post

But at least one purveyor of illicit goods apparently likes to keep up with their county sheriff's Facebook page: In a true triumph for both law enforcement and whatever old-school graphics software they used to make this thing, a tip sent to the phone number advertised on the flier helped sheriff Pat Melton track down a local drug dealer.

Vice

This is a cause for concern for both law enforcement agencies and public health officials, and research on privatization in British Columbia reveals that alcohol-related deaths increased 3.25% for each 20% increase in private store density [ 23].

BMC Public Health

An additional influence of SQ on Coulomb quantization of a Ps was considered both in 3D and 2D QDs for both dispersion laws.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Figure 4 illustrates the dependence of Ps binding energy in a spherical QD on the QD radius for both dispersion laws.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Thus, parents rely on their children for care in old age, and children must care for their parents according to both law and morality.

The Journal of Chinese Sociology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for both laws", ensure it's clear which two laws you are referring to. Ambiguity can be avoided by naming the laws explicitly or providing sufficient context.

Common error

Avoid using "for both laws" without clearly identifying the specific laws in question. Always provide enough context to prevent confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both laws" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase modifying a verb or noun. It indicates the scope or applicability of something concerning two specific legal statutes.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for both laws" is a grammatically sound prepositional phrase used to specify that a statement, rule, or regulation applies to two distinct legal statutes. While the Ludwig AI identifies it as correct, the absence of direct examples underscores the importance of providing clear context when employing this phrase. For clarity, it's crucial to explicitly identify or provide sufficient context about which two laws are being referenced. Alternatives like "under both laws" or "regarding both laws" can also be considered, depending on the intended emphasis and nuance. Using "for both laws" effectively ensures the reader understands the precise scope of the discussion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

under both laws

Replaces "for" with "under", shifting the focus to compliance or governance by the laws.

regarding both laws

Substitutes "for" with "regarding", indicating the context is about the two laws.

concerning both laws

Uses "concerning" instead of "for", emphasizing the relation or subject matter of the laws.

in relation to both laws

Emphasizes the connection or link between a topic and the two specified laws.

with respect to both laws

Puts more formal stress on how the situation is seen regarding the laws.

applicable to both laws

Focuses on applicability and situations where the laws can be put to use.

in the context of both laws

Positions the discussion or situation within the framework defined by the laws.

pertaining to both laws

Similar to 'concerning', but suggests the laws are directly relevant to the situation.

in compliance with both laws

Highlights adherence and following the mandates of the laws.

as regards both laws

Formal alternative highlighting what's being considered in light of both laws.

FAQs

How can I use "for both laws" in a sentence?

You can use "for both laws" to indicate that a rule, regulation, or consideration applies to two specific laws. For example: "The compliance requirements are the same "for both laws"."

What phrases are similar to "for both laws"?

Similar phrases include "under both laws", "regarding both laws", and "concerning both laws". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired emphasis.

Is it better to use "for both laws" or explicitly name the laws?

Explicitly naming the laws is often clearer, especially if the audience may not know which laws are being referenced. However, if the context makes it obvious, "for both laws" is acceptable.

When is it inappropriate to use "for both laws"?

It is inappropriate to use "for both laws" if the reader or listener doesn't know which two laws are being discussed, or if more than two laws are being considered. In such cases, clarity is improved by being specific.