for both guerrillas

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for both guerrillas" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing two guerrilla groups or individuals, often in a comparative or inclusive manner. Example: "The strategy was designed to benefit both guerrillas in their fight for independence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

And to make matters worse, demand for drugs from rich countries such as the United States will continue to provide money for both guerrillas and paramilitaries.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Since the Israelis pulled out of most of Lebanon last April, the southern port city of Sidon has become a sort of magnet for both Palestinian guerrillas and Islamic fundamentalist militiamen, according to United Nations observers in the area.

The New York Times

In addition to allowing police safe entry to wipe out the coca crops, the troops could have the additional effect of attacking a prime revenue source for both the guerrillas and the paramilitary fighters, who have become increasingly involved in the drug trade.

Los Angeles Times

Private militias, which battled both guerrilla groups for much of the 1990s and well into this decade, have largely disbanded.

The New York Times

Some Kurds, such as President Jalal Talabani, have made similar noises, calling for an amnesty for guerrillas who are not guilty of acts of terrorism.

The Economist

The Justice and Peace Law, a negotiation with all sectors of Congress, has set a framework for both paramilitary and guerrilla leaders accused of crimes, providing a compromise between peace and justice.

The New York Times

The tightly packed warrens of streets made for an ideal battlefield for guerrillas.

Los Angeles Times

The COP corpus is divided into 4 subcorpora labelled as follows: the initial of the illegal actor (G for guerrillas, and P for paramilitaries), and 1 for reports of the period 1998 2002, or 2 for those of the period 2002 2006.

Functional Linguistics

As for the guerrillas who were killed, "they weren't there preparing for Easter festivities".

The New Yorker

Troops have begun to comb the area for the guerrillas, Mr. Gupta said.

The New York Times

Uribe's hatred for Farc guerrillas stems from the death of his father.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for both guerrillas", ensure the context clearly defines which two groups of guerrillas are being referenced to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "for both guerrillas" if there are more than two guerrilla groups involved, as it implies that only two specific groups are being considered. In such cases, use a broader term or specify all groups.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both guerrillas" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase specifying the recipients or beneficiaries of an action or condition. As Ludwig AI states, this phrase can be used when discussing two guerrilla groups or individuals, often in a comparative or inclusive manner.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for both guerrillas" is a prepositional phrase used to specify that something pertains to two particular guerrilla groups. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct, though infrequent. Predominantly found in news and media contexts, it is best employed when clarity and specificity are crucial, ensuring the reader understands exactly which groups are being discussed. When using this phrase, avoid ambiguity by clearly defining the referred groups, and consider alternative phrasings if more than two groups are involved.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

applicable to both guerrillas

Emphasizes applicability rather than direct association.

concerning both guerrillas

Focuses on relevance to both groups.

regarding the two guerrilla groups

More formal; specifies 'groups' instead of individuals.

for each guerrilla group

Highlights the individual application to each.

affecting both guerrilla factions

Uses 'factions' instead of 'guerrillas', implying internal division.

directed at both guerrilla forces

More aggressive tone; implies action aimed at them.

in relation to both guerrilla units

More technical and distanced phrasing.

for the guerrillas on both sides

Highlights opposing sides or factions of guerrillas.

to aid both sets of guerrillas

Implies assistance or support towards both groups.

with respect to both guerrillas

Very formal, suggests a detached consideration.

FAQs

How can I use "for both guerrillas" in a sentence?

You can use "for both guerrillas" to indicate something that applies or is intended for two specific guerrilla groups. For example: "The agreement includes provisions "for both guerrillas" to disarm and reintegrate into society."

What are some alternatives to "for both guerrillas"?

Alternatives include "for each guerrilla group", "regarding both guerrilla factions", or "concerning the two guerrilla groups", depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey. Consider "for each guerrilla group" if you want to emphasize the individual application of something to each guerrilla group.

When is it appropriate to use "for both guerrillas"?

It is appropriate to use "for both guerrillas" when you are specifically referring to two distinct guerrilla groups and want to indicate something that relates to or affects them jointly. Avoid using it if more than two groups are involved, as it would be inaccurate.

What's the difference between "for both guerrillas" and "for all guerrillas"?

"For both guerrillas" refers specifically to two identified guerrilla groups, whereas "for all guerrillas" refers to every guerrilla group without specifying a number. The former is specific, and the latter is general.