for both distinctions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for both distinctions" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to two different categories or classifications that are being discussed or compared. Example: "The study highlights the importance of understanding the implications for both distinctions in the research findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Scruggs is not the only one of them to have been portrayed in the movies ("The Insider"), or to pilot his own jet, but he is the only lawyer notable for both distinctions.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

In her review, Kipnis writes that Nelson's approach to her subject is notable for both its "distinction-blurring trains of association" and its poetic suppleness.

The New York Times - Books

In the narrow gap between these two early works you can sense his great potential for parsing subtle distinctions, both emotional and physiological.

The New York Times - Arts

For both questionnaires the distinction between the different response choices is emphasized by the use of different colors and icons based on smileys.

BMC Health Services Research

Like the division of the text that is part of the work of commentary, this strategy involves both making distinctions, for which medieval scholastics are well-known, but also a synthesis, finding the unity of a text and the unity of a set of diverse questions under larger questions in disputation.

SEP

Musical sounds both draw on and stymie the mind's mechanisms for making distinctions.

The New Yorker

You're the man for fine distinctions: backtrack!" Gotchaed again.

The New York Times - Magazine

Mr. Aw has an eye for status distinctions.

The New York Times - Books

Ms. Gorokhova has a nice eye for class distinctions.

The New York Times - Books

The issues they raise beg for careful distinctions.

Princeton University

See this article for the distinctions.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure that the distinctions you are referring to are well-defined and understood in the context of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "for both distinctions" when a simpler phrase like "for both" or "in both cases" would suffice. Overusing the phrase can make your writing sound unnecessarily complex or formal. For example, instead of saying "This rule applies for both distinctions of employee and manager", consider "This rule applies to both employees and managers".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both distinctions" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or verb, adding specificity. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase emphasizes that a statement or characteristic applies equally to two separate and distinct categories. The example provided by Ludwig shows the phrase used to highlight implications for two employee types.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Academia

32%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for both distinctions" is a grammatically sound prepositional phrase used to emphasize equal relevance or impact across two clearly defined categories. Ludwig AI categorizes its use as correct in written English and finds it present across various reliable sources from News & Media, Academia and Science. While examples are not very common, its appearance across these domains indicates versatility, while suggesting neutral to formal usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

regarding both differences

Emphasizes the 'differences' instead of 'distinctions'.

concerning both differentiations

Uses a more formal term 'differentiations'.

in relation to both variances

Focuses on 'variances', suitable when discussing statistical differences.

with respect to both dissimilarities

Replaces 'distinctions' with 'dissimilarities', stressing a lack of similarity.

considering both variations

Emphasizes 'variations', appropriate when discussing slight changes.

about both unique aspects

Shifts the focus to the 'unique aspects' of the subjects being compared.

regarding both discrete elements

More formal and specific than the query.

concerning both separate features

Shifts the focus to the "separate features".

in light of both contrasts

Highlights 'contrasts', emphasizing opposition between the two.

with both points of divergence

Focuses on where two things 'diverge' or differ.

FAQs

How can I use "for both distinctions" in a sentence?

You can use "for both distinctions" to emphasize that a statement applies to two specific and different categories. For example, "The policy change has implications "for both distinctions" of full-time and part-time employees."

What are some alternatives to "for both distinctions"?

Some alternatives include "for both categories", "regarding both types", or "concerning both classes", depending on the specific context. You could also use simpler phrases like "for both" or "in both cases" if the context is already clear.

Is it more appropriate to use "for both distinctions" or "for all distinctions"?

"For both distinctions" is used when referring to two specific, already defined distinctions. "For all distinctions" would be used when referring to every possible distinction within a given set. The correct choice depends on whether you are referencing specific examples or making a general statement.

What is the difference between "distinction" and "difference" when using the phrase "for both"?

While "distinction" and "difference" can be similar, "distinction" often implies a more formal or significant separation. Using "for both distinctions" suggests that the categories being compared have notable and well-defined differences, whereas "for both differences" might imply smaller or less formal variations.