for both concerned

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for both concerned" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete expression and may be intended to refer to both parties involved in a situation. Example: "The decision was made with consideration for both concerned parties."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Practically speaking, there are benefits for both concerned.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Meanwhile, I am equally eager to vacate these premises, being both concerned for my personal safety and acutely aware there's zero chance of making a sale from an irate suburbanite with significant boundary issues.

Huffington Post

For many concerned organizations, both the number of submitted reports in itself and the number of associated drug ADR combinations are too large for exhaustive manual review.

Drug Safety

The result is a win-win situation for all concerned, as both artists and museums benefit from their joint efforts.

Huffington Post

It's a challenge best met as a common cause, on common ground, for all concerned with both responsible use of evidence, and responsiveness to the needs of patients that go on when evidence runs thin.

Huffington Post

After a stellar Game 1, Camby averaged just 4.7 rebounds the rest of the series and missed Game 3. Looking back, Houston said there was "an emotional void" for both Camby and his concerned teammates.

The New York Times

Good deal for all concerned?

The New York Times

It is pretty emotional for all concerned".

The Guardian - Sport

And that is difficult for all concerned".

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"This is a wonderful discovery for all concerned".

Independent

"I'm going for a concerned, sensitive voice".

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use more common and grammatically correct alternatives such as "for all parties involved" or "for all stakeholders" to ensure clarity and avoid misinterpretations.

Common error

Avoid using "concerned" directly after "both" to modify an implied noun. Instead, clarify who or what is "concerned" by using phrases like "both parties concerned" or "all those concerned".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both concerned" functions as a prepositional phrase intended to express consideration or relevance to multiple parties. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, it is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It requires clarification to specify the entities to which it refers.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for both concerned" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and is rarely used. Ludwig AI flags it as needing clarification to specify the entities involved. Although it appears in News & Media and Science contexts, it's best to avoid it in favor of clearer alternatives such as "for all parties involved" or "for all stakeholders involved". Always ensure clarity by explicitly stating who or what is "concerned" to avoid ambiguity and maintain grammatical correctness. Using more precise language enhances the professionalism and clarity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for all parties involved

Replaces "both concerned" with a more explicit term, specifying the parties.

for all stakeholders involved

Substitutes "concerned" with "stakeholders", focusing on those with a vested interest.

for everyone affected

Highlights those impacted by a situation, rather than just those who are concerned.

with regard to all concerned

Adds a formal tone using "with regard to" and maintains the focus on those concerned.

considering all relevant parties

Focuses on the act of considering relevant individuals or groups.

for the benefit of all parties

Shifts the focus to the positive outcome for those involved.

in the interest of all concerned

Emphasizes acting in the best interest of the involved parties.

for both interested parties

Replaces "concerned" with "interested", altering the nuance slightly.

regarding all individuals involved

Offers a broader term than "concerned", encompassing all individuals.

with respect to all parties

Implies courteous consideration for all involved.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "for both concerned"?

Instead of "for both concerned", you can use phrases like "for all parties involved", "for all stakeholders involved", or "for everyone affected" depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "for both concerned"?

No, "for both concerned" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use phrases that explicitly state who or what is being referred to, such as "for both parties concerned" or "for all those concerned".

How can I use "concerned" correctly in a similar context?

To use "concerned" correctly, ensure it modifies a noun or noun phrase clearly. For example, "for the parties concerned" or "for the individuals concerned" are grammatically sound.

What is the difference between "for both concerned" and "for all concerned"?

"For both concerned" is incomplete and grammatically awkward. "For all concerned" is better because it more directly addresses all individuals or entities affected by a situation, but still should be followed by an explicit noun in most contexts to avoid ambiguity.