for all concerned

USAGE SUMMARY

"for all concerned" is a perfectly correct and commonly-used phrase in written English.
You can use "for all concerned" to express that a particular situation affects multiple people or groups. For example, "We should come to a decision that will be beneficial for all concerned."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Better for all concerned.

The New Yorker

For all concerned, the stakes are huge.

The New York Times

Good thing for all concerned.

The New York Times - Sports

Sherman's decision was painful for all concerned.

The New York Times

It is a tragedy for all concerned.

The Guardian - Books

The collaboration proves rewarding for all concerned.

The New York Times - Arts

Thermotherapy can be healthy for all concerned.

The New York Times - Food

It still ended badly for all concerned.

The Guardian

The result is catastrophic for all concerned.

The Guardian

It was incredibly traumatic for all concerned.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Either way, it's one to forget for all concerned.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "for all concerned" when you want to indicate that a situation, decision, or action has implications for multiple individuals or groups. It's a concise way to acknowledge broad impact.

Common error

While versatile, "for all concerned" can sound slightly stiff in very formal writing. Consider alternatives like "for all stakeholders" or "for all parties involved" when addressing a highly professional audience. Reserve /s/for+all+concerned for general use.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for all concerned" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used as an adverbial modifier. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. It modifies a verb or clause to specify who is affected by an action or situation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

12%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for all concerned" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase. Ludwig's AI confirms its correctness and commonality. It serves to indicate that a situation, decision, or action affects multiple individuals or groups. While generally neutral in register, more formal alternatives like "for all stakeholders" or "for all parties involved" might be preferred in certain professional contexts. Primarily found in News & Media sources, it provides a concise way to acknowledge the broad impact of events or decisions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for everyone involved

Replaces "concerned" with "involved", focusing on direct participation.

for all parties involved

More formal, specifies "parties" suggesting distinct groups.

for all stakeholders

Business-oriented, highlighting those with a vested interest.

for all those affected

Emphasizes the impact on individuals.

for all interested parties

Similar to "stakeholders" but slightly broader.

for all who are affected

More verbose, emphasizes the state of being affected.

with everyone in mind

Highlights consideration and thoughtfulness.

considering everyone

A more direct and concise alternative.

in the interest of all

Focuses on the overall benefit for all parties.

to benefit everyone

Emphasizes the positive outcome for all involved.

FAQs

How can I use "for all concerned" in a sentence?

You can use "for all concerned" to indicate that a situation affects multiple individuals or groups. For instance, "This new policy will be beneficial "for all concerned"".

What phrases are similar to "for all concerned"?

Similar phrases include "for everyone involved", "for all parties involved", or "for all stakeholders", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "for all stakeholders" or "for all concerned"?

The best choice depends on the context. "For all stakeholders" is more specific to business and organizational settings, while "for all concerned" is a more general phrase applicable in various situations.

Can "for all concerned" be used in formal writing?

Yes, it can, but be mindful of the register. In highly formal contexts, consider more precise alternatives like "for all parties involved" to maintain a professional tone.