for both acquisitions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for both acquisitions" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to two specific acquisitions in a business or financial context. Example: "The report outlines the financial implications for both acquisitions and their impact on the company's growth strategy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

There is ample parking for both acquisitions, a situation that lends itself to multiple types of uses, he said.

The New York Times

There is ample parking for both acquisitions, a situation that lends itself to multiple types of uses, which do not limit tenant parking, he said.

The New York Times

For the ROIs placed in the end planes, SUVmean values were similar for both acquisitions but CVs changed from 75.0 and 50.0%% (CTM) to 96.6 and 65.5%% (SS), respectively.

EJNMMI Physics

For both acquisitions, a separate LC channel with 200 fmol/μL Glu-1-Fibrinopeptide in 50%acetonitrile/0.1%% formic acid flowing at 500 nL/min was referenced every 30 s through a nano lock-spray interface.

Analytical Chemistry

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

This is illustrated by consistently lower mean tmax values observed with [30 mm]3 compared to [20 mm]3 for both acquisition durations in all subgroups (see Table 2).

EJNMMI Research

For both acquisition methods, SC active voxels are mostly in the superficial half, but some intermediate/deep voxels have p<0.001 when measured with GE. Figure 2 shows the mean and standard deviation of BOLD signals (computed across all animals scanned with GE) from all voxels in the SC and LGN regions of interest (ROIs) in Fig. 1a.

Plosone

SoftWorX software (Applied Precision) was used for both acquisition and deconvolution.

Biology Open

For both acquisition and retention memory, significant beneficial effects were noted for all doses of ginsenosides.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

We then ran our algorithms to synchronize the slices and recover volumes for both acquisition geometries.

Biomedical Optics Express

The effect size was significantly higher for both acquisition and retention memory in studies that used female animals compared with male animals.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Funnel plots show asymmetry for both acquisition and retention memory data, indicating evidence of small study effects and 7(b); Egger regression, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.007, resp).

BioMed Research International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "for both acquisitions", ensure that the two acquisitions have been clearly identified previously in the text to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "for both acquisitions" if the specific acquisitions are unclear or not yet introduced in the context. Provide clear references or descriptions to ensure the reader knows exactly which acquisitions you are referring to.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for both acquisitions" functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a verb or noun. It specifies the scope or applicability of an action or statement, indicating it relates to two distinct acquisition events. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for both acquisitions" is a grammatically correct and usable prepositional phrase primarily employed in professional and scientific contexts. It serves to specify that an action, condition, or result applies to two distinct acquisition events. Ludwig AI analysis indicates that while the phrase is not exceedingly common, it is appropriate for use in scenarios where clarity and precision are paramount. To ensure effective communication, explicitly define the acquisitions you are referring to when employing this phrase. Consider alternatives like "regarding both acquisitions" or "concerning both acquisitions" depending on the desired tone and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

regarding both acquisitions

Replaces "for" with "regarding", indicating a topic of discussion or concern.

concerning both acquisitions

Similar to "regarding", but may imply a more formal or official context.

in relation to both acquisitions

More verbose, explicitly stating a connection or link.

pertaining to both acquisitions

Formal and emphasizes relevance or connection.

applying to both acquisitions

Highlights the applicability of something (e.g. a rule or principle).

relevant to both acquisitions

Focuses on the relevance or importance in the context of two acquisitions.

for the two acquisitions

Uses a more direct and less formal construction.

with respect to both acquisitions

A formal way to indicate consideration or reference.

in both acquisition scenarios

Focuses on the scenarios as opposed to the processes themselves.

across both acquisitions

Implies a comparison or a feature that is common to both.

FAQs

How can I use "for both acquisitions" in a sentence?

You can use "for both acquisitions" to specify that something applies to two distinct business deals, such as "The due diligence process was extensive "for both acquisitions"".

What are some alternatives to "for both acquisitions"?

Alternatives include "regarding both acquisitions", "concerning both acquisitions", or "in relation to both acquisitions" depending on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

Is it correct to say "for both acquisitions"?

Yes, "for both acquisitions" is grammatically correct and commonly used in business and financial contexts to refer to two specific acquisition events. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is a usable expression.

What's the difference between "for both acquisitions" and "for the two acquisitions"?

"For both acquisitions" implies that the two acquisitions are already known or understood, whereas "for the two acquisitions" may be used when introducing or emphasizing the number of acquisitions.