for almost all

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for almost all" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a statement or condition applies to nearly every instance or case, with very few exceptions. Example: "The new policy will be beneficial for almost all employees, improving their work-life balance."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Factum paid for almost all of it.

The New Yorker

Iron is an essential element for almost all bacteria.

Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry

Their natural distribution is demonstrated for almost all plant tissues.

Phytochemistry

Forests themselves were barriers for almost all target carabids.

Journal for Nature Conservation

An unofficial transcript will be sufficient for almost all employers.

Cornell University

In fact, membership is required for almost all access.

Cornell University

For almost all image files this is simply untrue.

Columbia University

He paid cash for almost all of them.

The New York Times - Magazine

State-owned banks accounted for almost all lending back then.

The Economist

It was a restorative week for almost all concerned.

The New York Times - Sports

I've lived in Manhattan for almost all of my life.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Enhance clarity by specifying who or what "almost all" refers to. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures the reader understands the scope of the statement.

Common error

Avoid using "for almost all" when the exceptions are significant or relevant to the discussion. Overgeneralizing can lead to inaccurate conclusions and weaken the argument. Provide specific details when exceptions are noteworthy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for almost all" functions as a quantifier, indicating a high degree of inclusivity but acknowledging exceptions. As Ludwig AI states, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

35%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for almost all" is a versatile quantifier that indicates a high degree of generality while acknowledging possible exceptions. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and broad applicability. It is commonly used in scientific, news, and academic contexts to convey that something is generally true, but not universally so. To ensure effective communication, use "for almost all" when the exceptions are minor and clearly understood, specifying the subject to avoid ambiguity. While "for almost all" is appropriate in many situations, be mindful of overgeneralization, and consider more precise language when the exceptions are significant.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in nearly every case

This alternative emphasizes the frequency with which the condition applies.

virtually all

This suggests that the few exceptions are insignificant.

for the vast majority

This alternative highlights that the group to which the condition applies is significantly large.

in the great majority

Similar to 'vast majority', but places emphasis on the quantity.

almost without exception

This emphasizes the rarity of exceptions to the rule.

for all intents and purposes

Focuses on the practical outcome being the same as if it were truly all.

practically all

Emphasizes the practical aspect of 'all', despite minor deviations.

essentially all

This suggests the main components are covered, with less relevant parts possibly excluded.

pretty much all

More informal, implies a relaxed acceptance of the exceptions.

largely all

Emphasizes the substantial, rather than complete, coverage.

FAQs

How can I use "for almost all" in a sentence?

You can use "for almost all" to indicate that something is generally true with only a few exceptions. For example, "The new policy will be beneficial "for almost all" employees" or "This rule applies "for almost all" cases".

What are some alternatives to "for almost all"?

Alternatives to "for almost all" include phrases like "in nearly every case", "virtually all", or "for the vast majority", depending on the context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "for almost all" or "for all"?

The choice depends on the accuracy needed. If there are indeed exceptions, then ""for almost all"" is more accurate. Using "for all" implies there are no exceptions, which may be misleading if that's not the case.

When is it inappropriate to use "for almost all"?

It's inappropriate to use ""for almost all"" when the exceptions are significant or relevant to the main point. In such cases, it's better to be more specific and quantify the exceptions or provide more details.