Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

for all members

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for all members" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something applies to every individual within a group or organization. Example: "The new policy will be implemented for all members of the organization starting next month."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Orthopyroxene is typical for all members of the series.

Email Use Policy for all members of the community.

(c) which related to equal percentage increase for all members.

Improved training for all members of the community.

The CPU is identical for all members of the '430 family.

It is required that the coupling eigenvalue be less than unity for all members of the ensemble.

This is a state whose purpose is to maximise the opportunities for all members of society.

News & Media

The Economist

Mr. Mueller added that discussions were under way to increase security for all members of Congress.

News & Media

The New York Times

It is a set of changes to the rule-book for all members.

News & Media

The Economist

It was the day's mandatory greeting for all members of D Company.

Under House rules, there was a term limit for all members, including the chairman.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider whether "for each member" or "for every member" might be more appropriate if you want to emphasize individual consideration within the group.

Common error

Avoid using "for all members" when the scope is not clearly defined. For example, stating "Benefits are available for all members" is vague without specifying which membership is being referenced. Provide clarity by specifying the group, such as "Benefits are available for all union members".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for all members" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or verb, indicating the scope or extent of an action, rule, or characteristic. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's used to specify that something applies universally within a defined group.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Academia

29%

Science

27%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

9%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "for all members" is a versatile and frequently used prepositional phrase signifying universal application within a group. Grammatically sound and widely accepted, as Ludwig AI indicates, it appears across diverse contexts, from news and academia to scientific research. While alternatives like "for every member" or "to all members" exist, "for all members" provides a succinct and clear means of conveying inclusivity. Remember to ensure the context clearly defines the group to avoid ambiguity. This phrase is a staple in formal and informal communication, making it essential for writers aiming for clarity and precision.

FAQs

How can I use "for all members" in a sentence?

You can use "for all members" to indicate that something applies universally within a group. For example: "The new policy applies "for all members" of the team."

What are some alternatives to "for all members"?

Alternatives include "for every member", "for each member", or "to all members". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "for all of the members" instead of "for all members"?

While not strictly incorrect, "for all members" is generally more concise and preferred. The inclusion of "of the" adds unnecessary length without significantly altering the meaning.

When should I use "for all members" versus "to all members"?

Both are acceptable, but "for all members" typically implies a benefit, provision, or regulation affecting the members. "To all members" often serves as a direct address or announcement. For example, "This discount is "for all members"," versus "An important message "to all members"."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: