for all involved

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for all involved" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to everyone who is part of a situation or event, often in discussions about outcomes or decisions. Example: "The decision to change the project timeline was made for all involved to ensure a smoother workflow."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Scary moment for all involved.

The New York Times

The situation is frustrating for all involved.

The Economist

Career best for all involved.

The Guardian

Still: hard work for all involved.

The Guardian - Film

School closures are traumatic for all involved.

The Guardian

And filled with anxiety for all involved.

The New York Times - Food

The experience is traumatic for all involved.

The Guardian - Film

A fantastic achievement for all involved.

The Guardian - Sport

I think it's a good transaction for all involved".

The New York Times

That would be the best for all involved".

The Guardian - Business

Is it a delicate, sometimes frustrating experience for all involved?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for all involved", ensure the context clearly defines who is included in "all". Be specific if necessary to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "for all involved" when the situation primarily affects a specific subset of people. Overgeneralizing can dilute the impact of your message and exclude those who are most concerned.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for all involved" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying an implied noun (e.g., a situation, decision, process) and indicating that something affects or concerns everyone participating or connected to it. Ludwig examples confirm this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

81%

Science

13%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "for all involved" is a versatile phrase used to indicate that a situation affects everyone connected to it. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used, particularly in News & Media. Alternatives like "for everyone concerned" offer similar meanings. When using this phrase, clarity is key; make sure the context clearly defines who is encompassed in "all". While versatile, avoid overgeneralization to maintain the impact of your message. Using this advice, the user can avoid possible errors and create clear communications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for everyone concerned

This alternative uses "everyone" instead of "all", emphasizing each individual's concern or stake.

for all parties

This alternative highlights that the situation involves distinct groups or sides.

for each person involved

This phrase emphasizes the individual aspect of being involved.

for all participants

This emphasizes the active role of those taking part.

for everyone taking part

Similar to "for all participants" but uses a more descriptive verb.

for those affected

Focuses specifically on individuals impacted by the event.

for all stakeholders

Highlights the vested interests of those concerned, often used in business contexts.

for all interested parties

Implies a level of interest or concern from the individuals or groups.

for all members

Applicable when referring to individuals belonging to a specific group or organization.

for everyone in question

Highlights that the people are subject of investigation or consideration.

FAQs

How can I use "for all involved" in a sentence?

You can use "for all involved" to refer to everyone who is part of a situation or event. For example, "The decision was made "for all involved" to ensure a smoother process".

What can I say instead of "for all involved"?

You can use alternatives like "for everyone concerned", "for all parties", or "for each person involved" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "for all involved" or "for everyone involved"?

Both "for all involved" and "for everyone involved" are grammatically correct and largely interchangeable. The choice often comes down to stylistic preference.

Which situations benefit from using the term "for all involved"?

The term "for all involved" is particularly useful in situations where you want to acknowledge the impact of a decision or event on everyone connected to it, promoting a sense of inclusivity and shared understanding. It's applicable in contexts ranging from project management to interpersonal relationships.