for a cost of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "for a cost of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the price or expense associated with a product or service. Example: "The new software is available for a cost of $200."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

4-hour permits are available for a cost of $5.00.

Cornell University

The seal was adopted in 1864 and was engraved in 1865 for a cost of $285.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The plan also calls for a cost of living index to protect workers against inflation.

The New York Times

Stern said she believed enough ISVAs could be provided for a cost of just £1m a year.

The Guardian

A typical course treatment is an injection a day for seven days, for a cost of about $70.

The New York Times

The document also claims one full-time employee is working on the project, for a cost of $100,000.

The Washington Post

The solar cooker can be made for a cost of about $17, Frank says -- about the same price as the current heavy concrete model.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

State workers have won a separate agreement from Gov. George Pataki and State Comptroller Carl McCall for a cost-of-living increase for retirees.

The New York Times

If not, ask if he would be prepared to come to a meeting with you and help you put your case for a cost-of-living rise.

The Guardian - Money

Consider, also, paying extra for a cost-of-living rider.

Forbes

"The district just doesn't have money for a cost-of-living pay adjustment," he said.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "for a cost of", ensure that you clearly specify what the cost refers to. For example, instead of saying 'The project was completed for a cost of $1000', say 'The project was completed for a cost of $1000, including materials and labor'.

Common error

Avoid using "for a cost of" without providing context about what is included in that cost. Ambiguity can lead to misunderstandings. Always clarify what the stated cost encompasses.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "for a cost of" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or verb. It indicates the monetary value associated with an action, object, or service. Ludwig's examples confirm its widespread usage across different contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "for a cost of" is a commonly used prepositional phrase that serves to specify the monetary expense associated with something. According to Ludwig, it's grammatically correct and frequently found in news, academic, and scientific contexts. When using this phrase, it's important to provide sufficient context to avoid ambiguity about what the cost includes. Alternatives such as "at a price of" or "with an investment of" can be used to subtly shift the emphasis. In conclusion, "for a cost of" is a versatile and clear way to convey financial information, as supported by its widespread usage across various authoritative sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

at a price of

Emphasizes the price rather than the general cost.

for the price of

Highlights the specific amount one must pay.

at an expense of

Focuses on the expenditure involved.

with an investment of

Highlights the investment aspect and financial input.

requiring an outlay of

Stresses the initial expenditure or investment needed.

entailing a payment of

Emphasizes the payment aspect of the cost.

at a charge of

Indicates the fee or charge applied.

for an investment of

Similar to "with an investment of", but slightly more formal.

incurring an expense of

Highlights the act of incurring or bearing the cost.

with a fee of

Specifies that the cost is a fee for service

FAQs

How can I use "for a cost of" in a sentence?

Use "for a cost of" to specify the price or expense associated with something. For example, "The renovation was completed "for a cost of" $5,000."

What are some alternatives to "for a cost of"?

Alternatives include "at a price of", "for the price of", or "at an expense of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "at a cost of" instead of "for a cost of"?

Both "at a cost of" and "for a cost of" are generally acceptable, but "for a cost of" is often preferred when directly stating the price. "At a cost of" might imply broader implications beyond just the monetary value.

What's the difference between "for a cost of" and "with a cost of"?

"For a cost of" is generally used to state a price or expense directly. "With a cost of" can imply that the cost is an attribute or consequence. Example: "The project was completed "for a cost of" $1,000" versus "The project came "with a cost of" some delays".