Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
for a better readability
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "for a better readability" is correct and can be used in written English.
When you want to emphasize the importance of writing that is easy to read, you can use this phrase. For example, "A clear and concise writing style is essential for a better readability."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
8 human-written examples
For a better readability the vertical scale is distinct for each component and each observatory.
Science
For a better readability, John, Prague, Frank can be simply such IDs.
For a better readability the vertical scale is distinct for each observatory.
Science
For a better readability, each type of result is discussed just after its presentation.
For a better readability of the network, we only show the nodes that were assigned to a cluster with our method.
For a better readability and distinction, in this paper, we simply consider two channel matrices (F i,t, G t,i ) with (mathbf {F}_{i,t}=mathbf {G}^{T}_{t,i}) and (mathbf {F}_{i,overline {t}}=mathbf {G}^{T}_{overline {t},i}).
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
52 human-written examples
For the sake of a better readability, these studies will be presented step by step, including their respective methodological approaches.
The second reviewer was therefore asking for improvement in the presentation of the data to thereby allow a better readability of the manuscript.
Science
Reading ease is expressed by a score from 0 100, with higher scores indicating a better readability.
Science
The results of conventional MP methods and spectral analysis methods are, respectively, shown in (a) and (b) for better readability.
A company called Chef Sleeve sells a disposable iPad cover that offers clearer plastic for better readability and a more snug fit.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "for a better readability", follow it with a clear explanation of what specific changes were made to improve readability. For example, "For a better readability, we have simplified the terminology."
Common error
Avoid using "for a better readability" as a blanket statement without providing specific details. Instead of saying, "For a better readability, the text was revised," specify what revisions were made, such as "For a better readability, complex sentences were broken down into shorter ones."
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
Adverbial phrase. "For a better readability" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause by providing the reason or purpose behind an action. It indicates the intention behind a modification or decision, as seen in Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "for a better readability" is a grammatically sound phrase used to justify modifications made to improve clarity, according to Ludwig. It serves as an adverbial phrase explaining the purpose behind design choices in writing. Predominantly found in scientific and technical contexts, the phrase maintains a formal tone. While effective, be sure to provide specifics on what actions were taken for improved clarity. Alternative phrases like "for improved clarity" or "to enhance comprehension" can be used to express similar ideas. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its validity and common use in relevant fields.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
for improved clarity
Focuses specifically on clarity, omitting the direct reference to "readability".
to enhance comprehension
Emphasizes the goal of making the content easier to understand.
to improve understanding
Similar to enhancing comprehension, but uses simpler wording.
for ease of understanding
Highlights the ease with which the content can be understood.
in the interest of clarity
Formal phrasing that prioritizes clarity as a guiding principle.
for greater clarity
Emphasizes the degree of clarity achieved.
to facilitate reading
Focuses on making the act of reading easier.
in order to improve readability
Rephrases the original intent using "in order to".
for the sake of clarity
Similar to "in the interest of clarity" but slightly less formal.
to aid in comprehension
Focuses on assisting the reader in understanding the material.
FAQs
How can I use "for a better readability" in a sentence?
You can use "for a better readability" to explain choices made in writing to improve clarity, such as "For a better readability, we simplified the terminology".
What are some alternatives to "for a better readability"?
Alternatives include "for improved clarity", "to enhance comprehension", or "to improve understanding", depending on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "for a better readability"?
Yes, "for a better readability" is grammatically correct and commonly used, especially in scientific and technical writing, to justify modifications made to improve clarity and understanding.
What's the difference between "for better readability" and "for a better readability"?
"For better readability" is also correct and more concise. The inclusion of "a" in "for a better readability" provides a slightly more emphatic or descriptive tone, but both are acceptable.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested