Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

followed from

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "followed from" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that one thing is a consequence or result of another. Example: "The conclusion followed from the evidence presented in the study."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

What followed from Tshabalala was inspired.

The second development followed from the first.

Jihads followed from what is now Senegal.

News & Media

The Guardian

Ms. Murphy soon followed from Manhattan.

This is the basic insight that followed from Markowitz.

What public safety catastrophes followed from their alleged misconduct?

Patients were followed from 2-36 meanhs (mean: 16.45 months).

Shouts and scuffling sounds followed from inside the room.

Two more followed from their next two visits.

A handful more followed from friends with the same message.

News & Media

The Guardian

And everything else just kind of followed from that".

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "followed from" to clearly establish a cause-and-effect relationship between events or ideas in your writing. This helps to create a logical flow and ensures that your argument is easily understood by the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "followed from" when describing a sequence of events without a clear causal link. Ensure that the event you're describing actually results from the preceding event, rather than simply occurring after it. For a sequence of events without causation, consider using 'after' or 'subsequently'.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "followed from" functions as a phrasal verb indicating causation or consequence. As noted by Ludwig AI, it connects a prior event or action with its resulting outcome. The examples show it linking causes and their logical or natural effects across diverse fields.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Academia

29%

Science

27%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "followed from" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to establish a causal connection between two events or ideas. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It is frequently found in news, academic, and scientific sources, indicating a neutral register. While alternatives like "resulted from" or "stemmed from" exist, "followed from" provides a clear and direct way to express consequence. Understanding its function and appropriate contexts ensures effective communication and avoids common errors in writing.

FAQs

How can I use "followed from" in a sentence?

Use "followed from" to indicate a consequence or result. For example, "The increase in sales "followed from" the new marketing campaign".

What are some alternatives to "followed from"?

You can use alternatives like "resulted from", "stemmed from", or "derived from" to express a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say "followed by" instead of "followed from"?

"Followed by" indicates a sequence in time, while ""followed from"" indicates a consequence. Use "followed by" when something happens after something else, and ""followed from"" when something is a result of something else.

How does "followed from" differ from "due to"?

"Followed from" emphasizes the sequence and consequence, while "due to" directly attributes something to a cause. "The accident "followed from" the driver's negligence" highlights the causal sequence. "The accident was due to the driver's negligence" directly states the cause.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: