follow by

USAGE SUMMARY

'follow by' is incorrect and not typically used in written English.
A correct and more commonly used phrase is 'followed by.' For example: He was visited by the police, followed by an angry mob.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

From Lemma 5, the following corollaries follow by taking the limits SNR→0 and SNR→∞, respectively.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The following results follow by Theorems 14 and 16. (Jensen type inequality).

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

"But I decided to follow by leading.

The New York Times

Used fuel would follow by 2010.

The New York Times

Exclusive content will follow by the end of the year.

The New York Times

Actual tightening may follow by the end of the year.

The Economist

When she goes out, two of them follow by motorcycle.

The Economist

You get a "ha-ha-ha" follow by an "oooh".

The New Yorker

Panasonic and Sony are to follow by the summer.

Independent

It is available in 31 countries, with six more to follow by the end of June.

The Guardian - Tech

Thursday's developments follow by days news of other corruption scandals in the Police Department.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When intending to express sequence, always use "followed by" instead of the incorrect "follow by".

Common error

Avoid using "follow by" when you mean "followed by." The latter is the correct way to indicate that one thing happens after another. "Follow by" is rarely appropriate and typically results from a grammatical error.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "follow by" functions incorrectly as a connector attempting to indicate sequence. However, according to Ludwig AI, this phrase is not standard English and is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct form to indicate sequence is "followed by."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Academia

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "follow by" appears in various sources, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the correct phrase to indicate sequence is "followed by". It's crucial to use ""followed by"" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness in your writing. Alternatives like "accompanied by" or "succeeded by" might be appropriate depending on the specific context. While "follow by" is a very common phrase its presence in various contexts should be carefully evaluated and corrected when aiming for accurate English. To avoid mistakes, always use ""followed by"" when referring to sequence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

followed by

This is the grammatically correct and most common alternative to indicate sequence.

accompanied by

This suggests that something occurs together with something else.

succeeded by

This indicates that something comes after something else in a series or sequence.

resulting from

This implies that something happens as a consequence of something else.

in accordance with

This means that something is done according to a specific rule or guideline.

pursuant to

This is a more formal way of saying "in accordance with".

in compliance with

This suggests adherence to rules or regulations.

stemming from

This highlights the origin or cause of something.

deriving from

Similar to "stemming from", this emphasizes the source or origin.

originating from

This emphasizes the starting point or beginning of something.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something happens after something else?

The correct phrase is "followed by". For example, "The presentation was "followed by" a Q&A session."

Is "follow by" ever grammatically correct?

In most contexts, "follow by" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase to indicate sequence is "followed by". There might be very rare, specialized contexts where it could appear, but these are exceptional.

What are some alternatives to saying "followed by"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "accompanied by", "succeeded by", or "resulting from".

Which is correct, "follow by" or "followed by"?

"Followed by" is the correct phrase in standard English. "Follow by" is generally considered a grammatical error when indicating sequence.