flow of debates

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "flow of debates" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the progression or movement of discussions or arguments over a particular topic. Example: "The flow of debates during the conference highlighted the differing perspectives on climate change."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

When they do, viewership goes up: it's a boon for the 24-hour news channels, but even they are hard-pressed to keep up with the constant flow of debates, photo ops, tarmac tirades, so many words spoken and misspoken and so many talk-show appearances.

The New York Times

Charts reflected the flow of debates including changing views to identify individual positions emerging from deliberative discussions.

BMC Medical Ethics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The flow of debate was so fast that it was difficult to follow.

The Guardian - Books

The speaker is essentially the referee of the Parliament, controlling the flow of debate and setting the agenda, though the Parliament historically has been weak compared with the presidency, which has sweeping powers.

The New York Times

As the debate unfolded Wednesday night, I found myself moving from the too-rapid flow of the Debate Room to my general Friendfeed aggregate stream, which was mostly focused on the debate as was Twitter and its related spawn.

TechCrunch

The reader is offered many an insight on Ireland, the ebb and flow of parliamentary debate, the nature of the Tory right wing, the business of government.

The Economist

To help improve the flow of the main debate, FBN had decided to restrict the field to eight people, which meant that there were no places on the stage for Chris Christie and Mike Huckabee.

The New Yorker

Countries that allow the free flow of information and debate, the exposing of corruption and other difficult issues, generally have more legitimate governments, more social resilience and stronger economies.

The New York Times

Such disruptions may also upend the political correctness that stifles the genuine free flow of discussion and debate in so many higher-ed institutions.

Forbes

This year it feels like the disdain and hate of Barack Obama is clogging up whatever free-flow of public debate that was left.

Huffington Post

The events of 2005 inevitably provoked an almost ceaseless flow of articles, books and debates in France.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "flow of debates" to describe the continuous and evolving nature of discussions, especially in contexts where arguments and viewpoints develop over time.

Common error

Avoid using "flow of debates" to describe static or unchanging arguments. This phrase is best suited for dynamic discussions where ideas are actively evolving and interacting.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "flow of debates" functions primarily as a noun phrase, describing the progression or movement of discussions. As Ludwig AI indicates, it captures the continuous and evolving nature of arguments, often in a structured setting.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "flow of debates" is a noun phrase used to describe the progression and dynamic nature of discussions, particularly in news, media, and scientific contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. While not extremely common, its precise meaning and suitability for formal discourse make it a valuable phrase. Alternatives such as "progression of arguments" or "course of discussions" can be used to convey similar meanings. Use this phrase when you want to emphasize the continuous and evolving nature of arguments and viewpoints as they develop over time. Be mindful to avoid using it in static or unchanging contexts. The expert rating of 4.1 reflects the phrase's grammatical correctness, source authority, and usage consistency.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

progression of arguments

Focuses on the sequential unfolding of arguments, highlighting the development of ideas.

course of discussions

Emphasizes the direction and path that discussions take, suggesting a structured movement.

stream of arguments

Implies a continuous and steady flow of arguments, like a river of ideas.

unfolding of dialogue

Highlights the process of a dialogue revealing itself gradually.

progression of discourse

More formal, emphasizes the structured and reasoned development of conversation.

legislative process

Specifically relates to the formal path that a bill or law takes through a governing body.

ebb and flow of discussions

Highlights the fluctuating intensity and direction of discussions, indicating natural rises and falls.

trajectory of arguments

Suggests a specific path or direction that arguments follow, often toward a conclusion.

evolution of debates

Focuses on how debates change and develop over time, emphasizing growth and transformation.

dynamics of discourse

Highlights the interactive and energetic forces at play within a conversation or debate.

FAQs

How can I use "flow of debates" in a sentence?

You can use "flow of debates" to describe how discussions progress. For example: "The moderator ensured a smooth "flow of debates" during the conference."

What are some alternatives to "flow of debates"?

Alternatives include "progression of arguments", "course of discussions", or "stream of arguments", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "flow of debates" formal or informal language?

"Flow of debates" is suitable for neutral to formal contexts, often used in news, academic, or professional settings. It may be less appropriate for very informal conversations.

What does "flow of debates" describe?

"Flow of debates" describes the way discussions and arguments evolve, proceed, and interact over time. It's about the dynamic nature of the conversation.