flexible enough to accommodate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "flexible enough to accommodate" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing something that has the ability to adapt or adjust to different needs or situations. Example: "Our new software is flexible enough to accommodate various user preferences and workflows."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Formal & Business

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The programme should be flexible enough to accommodate young people's needs.

The Guardian - Opinion

The PhD qualifying examinations are flexible enough to accommodate students with any master's degree preparation.

Stanford University

The proposed system framework is flexible enough to accommodate new acquired knowledge for each module.

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

This design is flexible enough to accommodate future upgrades in final proton energy.

Physics Procedia

It was a traditional world, but one that was flexible enough to accommodate Ansary's American mother and her exotic ways.

The New York Times - Books

Ms. Friedman, who is in her late 30's, says her life is flexible enough to accommodate house calls.

The New York Times

The result is a style that has trademark elements but is flexible enough to accommodate a range of influences.

The New York Times - Arts

Utzon's design, based on an embracing pair of L shapes, was flexible enough to accommodate them all.

The New Yorker

I feel different every moment of the day and my music needs to be flexible enough to accommodate this.

The New York Times

"The system needs to be flexible enough to accommodate extraordinary individuals like Sara Granda," Mr. Schwarzenegger wrote.

The New York Times

The Mathematics program provides a broad education in various areas of mathematics and is flexible enough to accommodate many interests.

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing systems or designs, use "flexible enough to accommodate" to highlight their adaptability to future changes or diverse needs. For example, "The software architecture is flexible enough to accommodate new features without requiring a complete overhaul."

Common error

Avoid using "flexible enough to accommodate" when the context implies near-infinite adaptability. Be realistic about the limitations and specify what the subject can reasonably accommodate. For example, instead of saying 'The policy is flexible enough to accommodate all situations', specify 'The policy is flexible enough to accommodate most common scenarios'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "flexible enough to accommodate" functions primarily as an adjectival modifier. It describes the quality of something being adaptable and capable of adjusting to different requirements or situations, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

27%

News & Media

25%

Academia

22%

Less common in

Formal & Business

13%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "flexible enough to accommodate" is a versatile phrase used to describe something adaptable to various situations. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and frequent use across diverse contexts such as science, news, academia, and formal business settings. While common, ensure that its use aligns with the described level of adaptability, and consider context-specific alternatives like "flexible enough to meet" or "adaptable enough to support" for nuanced communication. This phrase indicates a system or design's ability to adjust or incorporate new elements effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficiently flexible to accommodate

Adds "sufficiently" to emphasize the degree of flexibility required for accommodation.

flexible enough to meet

Replaces "accommodate" with "meet", focusing on satisfying specific requirements or needs.

elastic enough to accommodate

Replaces "flexible" with "elastic", suggesting a capability to stretch or adapt easily.

flexible enough to handle

Substitutes "accommodate" with "handle", highlighting the ability to manage or deal with something.

flexible enough to address

Replaces "accommodate" with "address", emphasizing the capability to deal with or focus on specific issues.

flexible enough to incorporate

Changes "accommodate" to "incorporate", suggesting the ability to include or integrate something new.

flexible enough to adapt to

Replaces "accommodate" with "adapt to", focusing on the ability to adjust or change to fit new conditions.

flexible enough to absorb

Uses "absorb" instead of "accommodate", indicating the capacity to take in or assimilate new information or changes.

adaptable enough to support

Replaces "flexible" with "adaptable" and "accommodate" with "support", highlighting the ability to adjust and provide assistance.

versatile enough to meet

Uses "versatile" instead of "flexible" and "meet" instead of "accommodate", focusing on the ability to perform in many different situations and satisfy requirements.

FAQs

How can I use "flexible enough to accommodate" in a sentence?

You can use "flexible enough to accommodate" to describe something that can adapt to different situations or needs. For example, "The curriculum is "flexible enough to accommodate" different learning styles."

What are some alternatives to "flexible enough to accommodate"?

Alternatives include "flexible enough to meet", "flexible enough to handle", or "adaptable enough to support", depending on the specific context.

Is it redundant to say "sufficiently flexible enough to accommodate"?

Yes, adding "sufficiently" before "flexible" can be redundant. It's better to simply say ""flexible enough to accommodate"" to convey the same meaning without unnecessary words.

What does it mean when something is "flexible enough to accommodate" changes?

It means that the system, plan, or design is capable of adapting to alterations or modifications without significant disruption or failure. It can adjust to new requirements or conditions effectively. The opposite would be a rigid system, which is not "flexible enough to accommodate" changes.