flagrant breach of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "flagrant breach of" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal or formal contexts to describe a serious violation of rules, laws, or agreements. Example: "The company faced severe penalties due to its flagrant breach of environmental regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It is flagrant breach of international human rights law".

Independent

This is the most flagrant breach of individual rights" at Guantánamo.

The New York Times

The European Commission seems likely to challenge this apparently flagrant breach of European law.

The Economist

It said that to do so would be a "flagrant breach of the Data Protection Act".

The Guardian - Money

The UK, he said, is "in flagrant breach of its international obligations.

The Guardian

The Assad regime is in flagrant breach of the UN chemical weapons convention.

The Guardian - Opinion

The incident, regarded as a flagrant breach of the country's neutrality, became known as "Whiskey on the rocks".

The Economist

UNRWA has condemned the placement of 20 rockets in one of its schools as a "flagrant breach" of international law.

The Guardian

Harry Hardy Peach, the author of "Let Us Tidy Up (1929)," wrote that litter was a "flagrant breach of national good form," a violation of citizenship itself.

The New Yorker

His lawyer, Dean Dunham, accused Scotland Yard of a "flagrant breach" of Starr's human rights due to delays in the case.

Independent

The following day, in flagrant breach of the treaty, the Kaiser's army marched across the border, expecting their tiny neighbour to put up no resistance.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "flagrant breach of", ensure the context clearly indicates a serious violation of established rules, laws, or agreements. It is best suited for formal writing and legal or official contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "flagrant breach of" in casual conversation or informal writing. The phrase carries a formal tone and may sound overly dramatic or pretentious in such settings. Opt for simpler alternatives like "obvious violation" or "clear disregard".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "flagrant breach of" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as the object of a verb or preposition. It describes an action or situation that violates a rule, law, or agreement in a blatant and obvious manner. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Formal & Business

12%

Wiki

4%

Less common in

Science

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "flagrant breach of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, primarily found in formal and professional settings like news and legal contexts. It serves to strongly condemn obvious violations. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is considered correct and usable. Related phrases include "egregious violation of" and "blatant infringement of", offering nuanced alternatives. When employing "flagrant breach of", ensure the context aligns with its formal tone to avoid sounding out of place.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Egregious violation of

Emphasizes the shocking and appalling nature of the violation, similar to "flagrant".

Blatant infringement of

Highlights the open and obvious nature of the violation, comparable to "flagrant".

Gross transgression of

Indicates a severe and unacceptable violation, akin to "flagrant".

Outright defiance of

Focuses on the act of openly resisting or disobeying, similar to a "flagrant breach".

Manifest disregard for

Stresses the clear and evident lack of respect or consideration, comparable to a "flagrant breach".

Open contravention of

Highlights the public and unconcealed nature of the violation.

Severe dereliction of

Focuses on the serious neglect of duty or responsibility.

Patent violation of

Emphasizes the obvious and undeniable nature of the violation.

Unmitigated flouting of

Highlights the complete and unrestrained disregard for the rules or laws.

Grave infringement upon

Emphasizes the serious and significant impact of the violation.

FAQs

How to use "flagrant breach of" in a sentence?

Use "flagrant breach of" to describe a situation where someone or something has clearly violated a rule, law, or agreement in a blatant and unacceptable manner. For instance, "The company's actions were a "flagrant breach of" environmental regulations".

What can I say instead of "flagrant breach of"?

You can use alternatives like "egregious violation of", "blatant infringement of", or "gross transgression of" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "flagrant breach of" or "flagrant violation of"?

"Flagrant breach of" and "flagrant violation of" are both grammatically correct and can often be used interchangeably. However, "breach" often implies a breaking of a contract or agreement, while "violation" can refer to any rule or law.

What's the difference between "flagrant breach of" and "minor infraction of"?

"Flagrant breach of" signifies a serious and blatant violation, whereas "minor infraction of" refers to a less significant offense. The former implies a deliberate disregard for rules, while the latter suggests a less severe or unintentional oversight.